When, by the use of the remedies already mentioned, the progress of
the gangrene is stopped, the ulcerative action is induced in the part
immediately adjoining to the dead portion, and a red line of separation
appears. By means of this ulcerative action, which takes place in
every point where the mortification stops, the dead part is separated
from the living, and comes away as soon as the bonds of dead muscular
fibres, tendons, &c. which unite them, are destroyed by putrefaction.
When this separation takes place, or when it is advanced so far as
to permit us to accelerate it by dividing the loose tendons, &c. the
exposed part must be dressed as an ulcer, or wrapped up in a poultice
of the same temperature with the human body.
If, however, the disease have penetrated deep, and destroyed the limb
so much as to render it impossible to cure it, or useless, if it were
possible, then amputation must be performed; but this, whatever desire
the patient may express, must not be practised until the mortification
be fully stopped, and the ulcerative action induced; because, if
performed sooner, the mortification seizes the stump, and the patient
is quickly killed. The system is likewise in such a state as to be
unable to sustain the action which is necessarily produced by the
operation. It is even improper to cut too near the diseased portion;
because the parts here, although the mortification be stopped, are so
weakened, that they are less apt to unite. The vessels often break out
soon after they are tied, and a new mortification is by no means an
unlikely occurrence. Even when the amputation is performed pretty far
up the limb, the corners of the stump frequently mortify, or become
livid; but a few doses of bark and wine stop the progress of the
disease.
Although it is a general rule that amputation is necessary whenever the
member is so destroyed as to become useless, and although this must
not be performed until the ulcerative action be induced, yet it must
not invariably be performed whenever this action takes place, because
sometimes at this period the patient is unable to sustain the general
action which the operation would produce. We must, therefore, if the
patient be much reduced by the extent, or long continuance of the
disease, rather delay until, by good diet, wine, &c. we have procured
an increase of strength; but, if we find that either the patient loses
ground, or his weakness remains stationary under this treatment, we
must then amputate; because, it is probable, that the continuance of
the dead portion in contact with the living is tending to induce still
the general action of descent[73].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account