Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
The first constitutional Convention in the history of the State was
the one which had met in Knoxville, and framed the Constitution under
which Tennessee had been admitted into the Union.[19] Conspicuous
among the members of the first Convention were John Sevier and Andrew
Jackson. The constitution they adopted was modelled after that of the
mother State, North Carolina. In 1834, a second Convention met at
Nashville, and modified the old Constitution, so as to bring it into
harmony with the industrial changes of the first quarter of a century.
The next assertion of constituent powers was in 1861, when the
Legislature passed the Declaration of Independence, and the Ordinance
of Union with the Confederacy. In 1865, the Radical Convention, as we
have seen, framed a number of constitutional amendments.
The newly elected convention assembled at Nashville on the 10th day of
January. The character of its members was a guaranty that its action
would be Conservative. It has been pronounced the most intelligent
body ever elected in Tennessee for any purpose. John C. Brown, an
ex-major-general of the Confederate army, was elected to preside over
its deliberations. As the Authorization Act did not limit the power of
the Convention, it was at liberty to enter into a thorough-going
provision of the constitution, but it manifested from the start the
intention to confine itself to the task of settling the question
growing out of the war. Chief among these was negro suffrage.
The Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States had
not yet been adopted, so it was still in the power of the State to
withhold the franchise from the negro. In the discussion of this
suffrage question, the Convention was divided into three factions. The
Union delegates, who were greatly in the minority, favored universal
suffrage. The extreme opposite opinion was expressed in the minority
report of the Suffrage Committee: “We hold that the negro race is the
lowest order of human beings, incapable in themselves of a virtuous
intelligence, or free government; and for the truth, we appeal to
history, and challenge the world to show a single exception. We hold
that the inferiority of the negro to the white man, in race, color,
and capacity for permanent, well-ordered government has been fixed by
Him who ‘doeth all things well,’ and whose natural or revealed law has
never been violated by any human government without disaster and
confusion.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account