Diversions of a NaturalistLankester, E. Ray (Edwin Ray), Sir
History
Diversions of a Naturalist
Lankester, E. Ray (Edwin Ray), Sir
Natural history
In connexion with this matter it is to be noted that the sperm of one
drone (her only mate) is retained in an internal sac or pouch, alive
and active, in the queen bee, for some four or five years, and is used
by her in successive seasons for fertilizing her eggs. Similarly it
is recorded by the late Lord Avery that a queen ant kept by him for
fourteen years, without access to a male ant, retained to the end of
that period the power of producing eggs which developed into worker
ants. He concluded that the sperm received fourteen years before by
this queen from a male ant remained all this time alive and ready
for use in her sperm-receptacle or sac, since it has been shown that
unfertilized eggs in these and allied insects produce only drones
(males).
Many strange and unwarranted beliefs persist because mankind prefers to
accept an astonishing assertion as true rather than take the trouble to
see whether it is so or not. Thus all antiquity and the later learned
world wrangled about the very existence of Homer's city of Troy, until
Schliemann said, "Don't talk! Dig!" and with childlike simplicity and
directness uncovered ancient Troy. Thus the belief as to St. Swithin
and his forty days of rain has been shown by the simple examination of
the actual records of rainfall to be very far from the truth, since,
though we often have a wet period in July and August, St. Swithin's
Day is nearly as often free from rain in a wet season as the reverse.
Forty days of rain very rarely indeed, in the South of England, have
followed a wet St. Swithin's Day. The most amusing instance of the
pricking of one of these bubbles of belief arose from the inquiry by
some of the sham philosophers at the Court of King Charles II as to
how it comes about that if a jar holding water be weighed, and then
a live fish be placed therein without spilling any of the water, and
the jar, with the fish and the water in it, be again weighed, there
is found to be no increase in the observed weight. King Charles, it
is said, made a bet that this was not so, and that there was nothing
to explain. He referred the matter for decision to the newly founded
"Royal Society for the Promotion of Natural Knowledge," which at other
times he had asked to give him information as to the magic properties
of the unicorn's horn and the cause of the movements of the recently
imported "sensitive or humble plant." The believers in the marvellous
disappearance of the weight of a fish placed in a bowl of water held
forth at great length and gave ingenious reasons as to why this is
so. But the King said, "Don't chatter; make trial!" And the weighing
was done, in the King's presence, by some of the Fellows of the Royal
Society. It was found that the weight of the jar with its contained
water was increased when the fish was placed therein by exactly the
number of ounces which the fish weighed when placed separately in
the balance. So the King won his bet, and the sham philosophers were
silenced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account