Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern lifeNiebuhr, Reinhold
Religion
Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life
Niebuhr, Reinhold
Christian civilization; Christianity; Philosophy and religion
Early Hebrew religion was naïvely dualistic, and that is one reason
why it has been so potent in the history of religion. God was
indeed conceived of as omnipotent; that conception was the path
that led to monotheism. But the idea of omnipotence was elaborated
dramatically rather than philosophically. The heavens might declare
his glory and the firmament show his handiwork, but he was revealed
in national history and (according to the conception of the later
prophets) in personal experience more than in natural phenomena. Even
a very early prophet discovered that the still small voice rather
than the earthquake or the fire was the symbol of his presence.
The Genesis account of the fall solves the problem of evil upon an
essentially monistic basis by making human sin responsible for even
the inadequacies of nature and attributing everything from weeds to
mortality to the luckless error of the first man. Neither the goodness
nor the omnipotence of God is abridged in this naïve but sublime
conception in which the human conscience assumes responsibility for
more than its share of human ills in order to save the reputation of
divine virtue. The monism of this account is, however, qualified by the
injection of the tempting serpent, an element which is precursory of
the belief in the devil, which the Jews inherited from Babylonia and
Persia and which has fortunately qualified all monistic tendencies in
Jewish and Christian orthodoxy until this day. A profounder instinct
than reveals itself to the casual observer persuades fundamentalism
to defend the reality of the devil with such vehemence. It may be
metaphysically inconsistent to have two absolutes, one good and one
evil, but the conception provides at least for a dramatic portrayal of
the conflict which disturbs the harmonies and unities of the universe,
and therefore, it has a practical and ethical value. The idea of
attributing personality to evil may be scientifically absurd but it
rests upon a natural error. When the blind and impersonal forces of
nature come to life in man they are given the semblance of personality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account