Domestic Animals: History and description of the horse, mule, cattle, sheep, swine, poultry and farm dogs; with directions for their management, breeding, crossing, rearing, feeding, and preparation for a profitable market; also their diseases and remedies. Together with full directions for the management of the dairy.Allen, Richard Lamb
Science
Domestic Animals: History and description of the horse, mule, cattle, sheep, swine, poultry and farm dogs; with directions for their management, breeding, crossing, rearing, feeding, and preparation for a profitable market; also their diseases and remedies. Together with full directions for the management of the dairy.
Allen, Richard Lamb
Domestic animals
The working age of the horse will not exceed an average of eight years,
while that of the mule is probably over sixteen. To the difference of
keep, then, must be added the annual waste of the capital invested in
the animal. A mule is more cheaply raised to working age than a horse,
but allowing them to cost equally, we shall have the horse exhausting
one-eighth of his capital annually for his decay, when the mule is using
up but one-sixteenth; and if we allow $48 as the first cost of both
animals, we shall find the horse wasting $6 annually for this item,
while the mule deteriorates but $3, making an additional item of
$9,000,000. This will give an aggregate of $39,000,000, as the annual
saving to the United States by substituting good mules for three-fourths
of the horses now used in this country. When will our farmers have the
good sense to make this change? It may be fairly answered, when they
shall prefer utility, interest, and a just taste, to a diseased fancy;
for though we admit the superiority in appearance of the race of horses
over mules, we deny that a bad horse looks better or even as well as a
good mule; and with the same keep and attention, a good mule will
outwork and outlook most horses of any breed.
The comparative Economy of Horse and Ox Labor.
This is a question which has been often discussed, and when with candor,
the conclusion has generally been in favor of ox-labor. The different
employments, the variety of situation, the season, and the kind of stock
reared on the farm, are all questions which should be fully considered
in arriving at their true comparative advantages. Most farmers would
find it for their interest to keep teams of each, where there is
employment for more than one; or if this be not the case, the preference
should be given to that which is best suited in all respects to their
particular position.
If work upon the road is required, a horse team will generally be best.
Their superiority will consist principally in their greater speed; for
even with a heavy load, they will be able to trot occasionally, and when
driven without it, they may increase their pace to nearly double the
natural gait of the ox. This will amount to a large annual saving in the
time of the driver when steadily employed. The same is true when
removing manures or crops on the farm to remote distances, over a smooth
surface, which admits of trotting with the empty wagon. Harrowing ought
always to be done with a quick team, as a violent stroke of the teeth
breaks the clods and pulverizes the earth much better than when slowly
dragged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account