Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
The Earl of Home, as a dangerous person, had for some time been confined
to his house of the Hirsel, near Coldstream; but now he was required to
enter himself prisoner in Edinburgh Castle. He represented himself as
under such indisposition of body as to make this unendurable, and the
Council therefore ordered Dr Sir Thomas Burnet, the king’s physician, to
take a chirurgeon with him to the Hirsel, and inquire into the state of
his lordship’s health. The doctor and surgeon reported in such terms
that the earl was allowed to remain at the Hirsel, but not without
caution to the extent of two thousand pounds sterling. For their pains
in travelling fifty miles and back, and giving this report, the Council
allowed Dr Burnet two hundred merks (£11, 2_s._ 2_d._), and Gideon
Elliot, chirurgeon, one hundred merks.[141]
[Sidenote: MAY 20.]
A _hership_ of cattle having taken place on the lands of Lord Rollo, in
Perthshire, the Master of Rollo was pleased to prosecute the matter a
little more energetically than was convenient to some of his neighbours.
He seems to have particularly excited the resentment of James Edmonstoun
of Newton, one of whose tenants was found in possession of a cow
reclaimed as part of the _hership_. Newton, being soon after at the
house of Clavidge, spoke some despiteful words regarding the Master,
which were afterwards taken notice of. At the same house, about the same
time, Patrick Graham, younger of Inchbrakie, spoke in the like angry
terms of the Master. ‘It has been noised in the country,’ said he, ‘that
I have courted the Master of Rollo, and fawned upon him; but when
occasion serves, something different will be seen.’
These two hot-headed men spent a couple of days together at Ryecroft, a
house of young Inchbrakie, and probably there inflamed their common
resentment by talking over their grievances. On the day noted in the
margin, hearing that the Master of Rollo was to go in the afternoon to
Invermay House, they rode to his house of Duncrub, and from that place
accompanied him to Invermay, together with the Laird of Clavidge and a
gentleman named M‘Naughton. Inchbrakie was remarked to have no sword,
while his companion Newton was provided with one. Supping at the
hospitable board of Invermay, these two conducted themselves much in the
manner of men seeking a quarrel. Inchbrakie said to the Master: ‘Master,
although John Stewart killed and [Sidenote: 1695.] salted two of your
kine, you surely will not pursue him, since your father and his Miss ate
them!’ Hereupon Clavidge remarked that this was not table-talk; to which
Newton made answer: ‘I think you are owning that.’ Then Inchbrakie and
Newton were observed to whisper together, and the latter was heard
saying: ‘I will not baulk you, Inchie.’ Afterwards, they went out
together, and by and by returned to table. What was the subject of their
conversation during absence, might only too easily be inferred from what
followed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account