Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
The king, seeing ‘it is below the justice of our government that any of
our loyal subjects should be disappointed of the benefit of our laws,’
was pleased to resort once more to that desperate remedy of letters of
fire and sword which he had, to all subsequent appearance, employed once
too often six years before in the case of the Glencoe Macdonalds. A
commission was accordingly granted to Lachlan Mackintosh of that Ilk, to
the governor for the time of Fort-William, Farquharson of Monaltrie,
Farquharson of Invercauld, and a number of other gentlemen, ‘to
convocate [Sidenote: 1698.] our lieges in arms, and pass and search,
seek, hunt, follow and take, and in case of resistance, pursue to the
death Coll Macdonald [and a multitude of other persons specified,
outlaws and fugitives from justice], and if any of them shall happen to
flee to houses or strengths [then grants full power] to asseige the said
houses or strengths, raise fire, and use all force and warlike engines
that can be had for winning thereof,’ slaughter of the persons pursued
not to be imputed as a crime.[222]
There was, in reality, nothing to prevent the same class of inhumanities
flowing from this order as had followed on the Glencoe commission, if
the officers intrusted with it had been disposed, as in the other case,
to carry it out to the letter. It was effectual for its purpose without
any extreme atrocities, and, three months after, we hear of a detachment
from Fort-William to assist Mackintosh ‘in maintaining his own lands
against Keppoch and others, who may disturb him in the peaceable
possession thereof.’
In a poem written in 1737, Coll Macdonald of Keppoch is spoken of as a
kind of Rob Roy, who had fought against the government at Killiecrankie,
Cromdale, and Dunblane; who had resisted the law regarding lands which
he occupied, and been denounced rebel on that account; who ‘from thefts
and robberies scarce did ever cease;’ but who had, nevertheless, not
merely kept possession of his territory, but rather improved his
circumstances; and finally, four years ago, had died at home in peace.
He was, says the poet in a note, ‘a man of low stature, but full of
craft and enterprise: his life, if printed, would make an entertaining
piece, whether one considers the depth of his genius, the boldness of
his adventures, or the various turns of adverse fortune which he bore
with uncommon steadiness, and had the art to surmount.’
[Sidenote: MAR. 1.]
A commission was granted by the Privy Council to Sir John Maxwell of
Pollock, —— Maxwell of Dalswinton, Hugh M‘Guffock of Rusco, Adam Newall
of Barskeroch, and four other gentlemen, to try, and, if guilty, adjudge
to death, Elspeth M‘Ewen and Mary Millar, now prisoners in the tolbooth
of Kirkcudbright, ‘alleged guilty of the horrid crime of witchcraft, and
[who] has committed several malefices.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account