Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
In April 1699, notwithstanding the severe procedure in the recent case
of the Catholics who met for worship at Aberdeen, it was found that the
Duke of Gordon made bold to have such meetings in his ‘lodging’ in
Edinburgh. If Macky is right in saying of him that ‘he is a Catholic
because he was bred so, but otherwise thinks very little of revealed
religion,’ we may suppose that his Grace was mainly induced by
good-nature to allow of these dangerous assemblages. However this might
be, the authorities made seizure of the Duke and a considerable number
of people of all ranks, as they were met together in his house for mass.
The whole party was soon after cited before the Privy Council, when his
Grace and seven of the other offenders appeared. The Duke spoke so
boldly of the laws against his faith and worship, that he was
immediately sent prisoner to the Castle; three others were put in the
Tolbooth. What was done with the rest, does not appear. After a
fortnight’s imprisonment, the Duke made a humble apology, and was
liberated.
In a letter from the king, dated at Loo, July 14th, the procedure of the
Council in the case of the Duke’s disrespectful expressions was approved
of, the more so ‘since those of that persuasion must be convinced they
have met with nothing from us but the utmost lenity.’ ‘We have ever,’
says William, ‘been adverse from prosecuting any on account of their
religion, so long as, in the exercise thereof, they have kept within the
bounds of moderation; but when, in contempt of our lenity, they proceed
to such ane open and barefaced violation of the laws as tends evidently
to the disturbance of the public peace, you may be assured we will never
countenance nor protect them, but suffer the law and justice to
[Sidenote: 1698.] have its due course.’ It is difficult to see how the
few Catholics of Edinburgh, if they were to be allowed their worship at
all, could have conducted it more inoffensively than by meeting in a
private house, or how it could be an offence on their part that the
vulgar were liable to be provoked to outrage by the fact of their
worshipping.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account