Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
At this date, the Privy Council, on Sutherland’s petition, took into
consideration his losses, his inadequate salary, and the good service he
was rendering, ‘whereby not only the young physicians, apothecaries, and
chirurgeons, but also the nobility and gentry, are taught the knowledge
of the herbs, and also a multitude of plants, shrubs, and trees are
cultivated which were never known in this nation before, and more
numerous than in any other garden in Britain, as weel for the honour of
the place as for the advantage of the people.’ They therefore declared
that they will in future allow Mr Sutherland fifty pounds a year out of
fines falling to them, one half for expenses of the garden, and the
other half by way of addition to his salary.[101]
[Sidenote: 1693. APR. 13.]
Mr Stephen Maxwell, ‘alleged to be a Romish priest,’ prisoner in
Blackness Castle, Mr George Gordon, Mr Robert Davidson, and Mr Alexander
Crichton, ‘also alleged to be popish priests,’ and prisoners in the
Edinburgh Tolbooth, were ordered to be set at liberty, provided they
would agree to deport themselves from the kingdom ‘in the fleet now
lying under convoy of the man-of-war lying in the Road of Leith,’ and
give caution to the extent of a hundred pounds that they would never
return. On the 17th, Mr James Hepburn, ‘alleged to be a popish priest,’
was ordered to be liberated from the Canongate Tolbooth on the same
terms. All of these gentlemen had been for many months deprived of their
liberty.
There still lay in Blackness Castle one John Seaton, who had been
apprehended in December 1688, on suspicion of being a priest, and
confined ever since, being four and a half years. He had been offered
the same grace with the rest; but he was prevented by his personal
condition from accepting it. According to his own account, he was
seventy years of age. He ‘has not only spent any little thing he had,
but his health is likewise entirely ruined, beyond any probability of
recovery.’ He was most willing to have gone abroad, ‘where he might have
expected better usage for ane in his condition than he can reasonably
propose to himself anywhere in this kingdom;’ but ‘when the rest went
away above a month ago, finding his health so totally broken by
sickness, old age, and imprisonment, and his infirmity still growing
worse,’ he was ‘necessitat to continue prisoner, rather than hazard a
long sea-voyage, whereby he could expect no less than an unavoidable
painful death, the petitioner, when formerly in health and strength at
sea, being still in hazard of his life.’ John Seaton further represented
that he had never, during his long imprisonment, received any support
from the government, but been maintained by the charity of his friends.
He now prayed the Council that they would take pity on him, and ‘not
permit him, ane old sickly dying man, to languish in prison for the few
days he can, by the course of nature and his disease, continue in this
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account