Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
According to the usual policy in such cases, the government (April
14, 1578) issued a proclamation commanding the possessors of grain to
thrash it out before the 10th of June, under pain of escheating, and
that no person should keep more victual than was sufficient to serve
him and his family a quarter of a year, the rest to be brought to the
market within twenty days. It was also ordered, that no grain should
be taken forth of the kingdom, but ‘strangers bringing in victual
should be favourably enterteened and thankfully paid.’--_Cal._ This
proclamation, being entirely accordant with the prejudices of the
masses, was ‘mickle commendit.’--_Moy._
Following the usual rule, the scarcity of 1577 was attended by an
epidemic disease. At least, so we think may be inferred from an entry
in Marjorebanks’s _Annals_, under 1580:
‘There was twa years before this time ane great universal sickness
through the maist part of Scotland: uncertain what sickness it was, for
the doctors could not tell, for there was no remede for it; and the
commons called it _Cowdothe_.’
* * * * *
[Sidenote: 1577-8.
MAR. 17.]
There was an ancient feud between the families of Glammis and Crawford,
but as the present lords were on the same side in politics, it was felt
by both as inexpedient that any hostility should take place between
them. Moreover, it would have been highly indecent of Lord Glammis, who
was chancellor of the kingdom, to allow any demonstration of rancour to
come from his side. Nevertheless, a fatal collision took place between
these two nobles.
[Sidenote: 1577-8.]
About the dusk of a spring day, Lord Glammis was coming down from
Stirling Castle to his own house in the town, attended as usual
by some of his friends and followers, when, in a narrow lane, he
encountered the Earl of Crawford similarly attended. The two nobles
bade their respective followers give way to the other; and the order
was obeyed by all except the two last, who either wilfully or by
accident jostled each other, and then immediately drew their swords and
fell a-fighting. A skirmish then took place between the two parties, in
the course of which Lord Glammis, whose stature made him overtop the
company, was shot through the head with a pistol, and many were hurt on
both sides.
‘Lord Glammis was a learned, godly, and wise man. He sent to Beza
when the work of policy was in hands, and craved his judgment in
some questions of policy; whereupon Beza wrote the book _De Triplici
Episopatu_, Of the threefold bishopric, divine, human, and devilish,
and his answers to his questions. Mr Andrew Melville made this epigram
upon him after his death:
Tu Leo magne jaces inglorius: ergo, manebunt
Qualia fata canes? qualia fata sues?
Since lowly lies thou, noble lyon fine,
What sall betide, behind? the dogs and swine?--_Cal._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account