Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
The Earl of Bothwell having been drawn into the designs of the
popish lords--though led only by a common hatred of the Chancellor
Maitland--raised a company of men, under pretence of an expedition for
the pacification of the remote isle of Lewis. Under favour of a royal
warrant, he demanded a subsidy of five thousand merks from the city
of Edinburgh. Meeting a refusal, he said he should ‘cause the earles
disgorge him a thousand crowns in spite of their hearts.’ There was
some resolution in these gentle burghers. When Bothwell impudently
carried off one of their number, named James Nicol, to Crichton Castle,
as a means of extorting money from him, they ‘threatened to pull
Bothwell out of Crichton by the ears, and make his house equal with the
ground.’ On their complaint to the king, ‘Bothwell, fearing the king
and the town of Edinburgh, set James Nicol at liberty, and so gained
nothing but shame and discredit to himself.’--CAL.
* * * * *
[Sidenote: SEP. 4.]
[Sidenote: 1589.
JUNE 3.]
Though Eustachius Roche is still described as tacksman-general of
the mines, it is to be suspected that that adventure was seen to be
unproductive, as we find him now entering upon a new contract with the
king for a wholly different object. He proposed to make a superior
kind of salt by a cheap process, assigning the profits to the king,
excepting only a tenth for himself and his heirs, ‘unsubject to
confiscation for ony offence or crime.’ He assured the king that this
project would add a hundred thousand merks yearly to his revenue. The
king on his part gave him the exclusive right to make salt in the
proposed new way, with certain other privileges.--_P. C. R._
A Bond of Association was entered into by Sir Walter Scott of Branxholm
and fifty of the most important men of his kin and clan, which throws
an important light on the customs of the age. A later and more notable
Sir Walter Scott says of this bond--which he had seen in the possession
of his cousin, William Scott, Esq. of Raeburn--that ‘it is calculated
to secure against any clansman taking any “room” or possession over the
head of another of the name. Any one who was accused of having done so,
bound himself to stand by the award of five men, to be mutually chosen,
bearing the name of Scott. Even if the chief should encroach upon the
possessions of any inferior person of the name, he declares he will
submit the cause, in like manner, to four persons of the name of Scott;
which shews an independence on the part of the clansmen which I was not
prepared for. The bond ... seems to have been calculated to prevent
kinsmen from going to law with each other, and to secure a species of
justice within the clan, to the advancement of the “guid and godlie
purposes” of their chief.’--_Pit._
* * * * *
[Sidenote: JUNE.]
‘In this time, [the Laird of] Easter Wemyss took up 1500 waged men for
the king of Navarre, now allegit king of France.’--_Moy._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account