Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
The matter was brought before the king in council (May 25) by the
English ambassador, who pleaded that Sir Walter Scott should be given
up to the queen for punishment. It was on this occasion that the
border knight defended himself in the terms above quoted. Of course his
own countrymen sympathised with him in a deed so gallant, and performed
from such a motive, and the king could not readily act in a contrary
strain. Elizabeth never obtained any satisfaction for the taking of
Kinmont Willie.--_Spot._ _Moy._ _H. K. J._ _C. K. S._ _P. C. R._
_Bir._[211]
* * * * *
[Sidenote: 1596 (?)
APR.]
‘... there came an Englishman to Edinburgh, with a chestain-coloured
naig, which he called Marroco ... he made him to do many rare and
uncouth tricks, such as never horse was observed to do the like before
in this land. This man would borrow from twenty or thirty of the
spectators a piece of gold or silver, put all in a purse, and shuffle
them together; thereafter he would bid the horse give every gentleman
his own piece of money again. He would cause him tell by so many pats
with his foot how many shillings the piece of money was worth. He would
cause him lie down as dead. He would say to him: “I will sell you to
a carter:” then he would seem to die. Then he would say: “Marroco, a
gentleman hath borrowed you, and you must ride with a lady of court.”
Then would he most daintily hackney, amble, and ride a pace, and trot,
and play the jade at his command when his master pleased. He would
make him take a great draught of water as oft as he liked to command
him. By a sign given him, he would beck for the King of Scots and
for Queen Elizabeth, and when ye spoke of the King of Spain, would
both bite and strike at you--and many other wonderful things. I was a
spectator myself in those days. But the report went afterwards that he
devoured his master, because he was thought to be a spirit and nought
else.’--_Pa. And._
This was ‘the dancing horse’ to which Moth alludes in Shakspeare
(_Love’s Labour Lost_, act I., sc. 2). The actual fate of Banks,
the keeper of the animal, was not better than that which vulgar
rumour assigned to him. It is almost an incredible, yet apparently
well-authenticated fact, that horse and man, after wandering through
various countries, were burnt together as magicians at Rome.
* * * * *
[Sidenote: 1596.
MAY.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account