Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
The whole proceedings were usually of the most cruel description;
and often the worst sufferings of the accused took place before
trial, when dragged from their homes by an infuriated mob, tortured
to extort confession, and half starved in jail. A wretch called John
Kincaid acted as a _pricker_ of witches[201]--that is, he professed
to ascertain, by inserting of pins in their flesh, whether they were
truly witches or not, the affirmative being given when he pricked a
place insensible to pain. Often they were hung up by the two thumbs
till, nature being exhausted, they were fain to make acknowledgment of
the most impossible facts. The presumed offence being of a religious
character, the clergy naturally came to have much to say and do in
these proceedings. For example, as to Margaret Nisbet, imprisoned at
Spott, in Haddingtonshire, the person ordered by the Privy Council
to take trial of her case and report is Mr Andrew Wood, the minister
of the parish. There are many instances in the Privy Council Record
of witches being cleared on trial, but detained at the demand of
magistrates, or clergymen, in the hope that further and conclusive
evidence would yet be obtained against them. Such was the case of
Janet Cook of Dalkeith, who had predicted of a man who beat her, that
he would be hanged--which came to pass; who bewitched William Scott’s
horse and turned him furious; and occasionally healed sick people
by the application of some piece of an animal killed under certain
necromantic circumstances. Janet had been tried, and acquitted; yet she
was kept in durance at the urgency of the kirk-session, as they were
getting fresh grounds of accusation against her.
Occasionally relenting measures were taken by the Council, though it is
to be feared not always with the approval of the local powers. On the
30th of January 1662, they considered a petition from Marion Grinlaw
and Jean Howison, the _survivors_ of ten women and a man who had been
imprisoned at Musselburgh on this charge. Some of the rest had died of
cold and hunger. They themselves had lain in durance _forty weeks_, and
were now in a condition of extreme misery, _although nothing could be
brought against them_. Margaret Carvie and Barbara Honiman of Falkland
had in like manner been imprisoned at the instance of the magistrates
and parish minister, had lain six weeks in jail, subjected to ‘a great
deal of torture by one who takes upon him the trial of witches by
pricking,’ and so great were their sufferings that life was become a
burden to them, notwithstanding that they declared their innocence, and
nothing to the contrary had been shewn. The Council ordered all these
women to be liberated.--_P. C. R._
* * * * *
[Sidenote: JULY.]
[Sidenote: 1661.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account