Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
Grant younger of Ballindalloch, reported to the Council that he had
lately taken an opportunity to attack some of the broken men who formed
the company of the outlaw James Grant. Entering into pursuit of two,
named Finlay M‘Grimmen and ---- Cumming, he and his people had killed
the first, and taken the second. They had carried Cumming three miles,
intending to exhibit him alive to the Council, along with the head of
M‘Grimmen; but the country rising upon them, they had been obliged to
put the man to death. The Lords accepted this act as good service, and
ordered M‘Grimmen’s head to be affixed to the Nether Bow Port; at the
same time giving the inbringer of it a guerdon of a hundred merks, ‘for
encouragement of others.’---_P. C. R._
* * * * *
[Sidenote: 1635.]
The year at which we are now arrived is the epoch of the establishment
of a regular letter-post in Scotland. There was previously a system of
_posts_, in the proper sense of the word--namely, establishments at
certain intervals, where horses could be had for travelling, and which
had the occasional duty of forwarding packets of letters regarding
public affairs. As illustrative of this system of posts, which was
probably limited to the road between Edinburgh and Berwick (as part
of the great line of communication with London), with possibly one or
two other roads--On the 29th of March 1631, the lords of the Privy
Council dealt with the fault of ---- Forres, postmaster of Haddington,
respecting a packet of his majesty’s letters which had been lost by his
carelessness. It appears that Forres was bound to have fresh horses
always ready for the forwarding of such packets; but on one late
occasion he had sent a packet by a foot-boy, who had lost it by the
way, and he had never taken any further trouble regarding it. On the
ensuing 3d of November, the Council had occasion to find fault with
William Duncan, postmaster in the Canongate, and more particularly
with a post-boy in Duncan’s employment, because the latter, instead
of carrying his majesty’s packet to the postmaster at Haddington, had
given it to ‘a whipman’ of Musselburgh, to be carried to Duncan’s house
there (designing probably that it should be forwarded by another hand).
The Council recommended Sir William Seton ‘to prescribe regulations
to the postmasters, for the sure and speedy despatch of his majesty’s
packet, both anent the postmasters their constant residence at the
place of their charge, and keeping of are register for receipt of the
packets.’--_P. C. R._
These circumstances appear as characteristic of a time when the postal
arrangements were at once very new and very simple.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account