Domestic medicine : $b or, a treatise on the prevention and cure of diseases by regimen and simple medicines. With an appendix, containing a dispensatory for the use of private practitionersBuchan, William
Science
Domestic medicine : $b or, a treatise on the prevention and cure of diseases by regimen and simple medicines. With an appendix, containing a dispensatory for the use of private practitioners
Buchan, William
Medicine, Popular -- Early works to 1800
Though no disease, after it is formed, baffles the powers of medicine
more effectually than the small-pox, yet more may be done before-hand to
render this disease favourable than any one we know, as almost all the
danger from it may be prevented by inoculation. This salutary invention
has been known in Europe above half a century; but, like most other
useful discoveries, it has till of late made but slow progress. It must
however be acknowledged, to the honour of this country, that inoculation
has met with a more favourable reception here, than among any of our
neighbours. It is still however far from being general, which we have
reason to fear will be the case, as long as the practice continues in
the hands of the faculty.
No discovery can be of general utility, while the practice of it is kept
in the hands of a few. Had the inoculation of the small-pox been
introduced as a fashion, and not as a medical discovery, or had it been
practiced by the same kind of operators here, as it is in those
countries from whence we learned it, it had long ago been universal. The
fears, the jealousies, the prejudices, and the opposite interests of the
faculty, are, and ever will be, the most effectual obstacles to the
progress of any salutary discovery. Hence it is that the practice of
inoculation never became in any measure general, even in England, till
taken up by men not bred to physic. These have not only rendered the
practice more extensive, but likewise more safe, and by acting under
less restraint than the regular practitioners, have taught them that the
patient’s greatest danger arose, not from the want of care, but from the
excess of it.
They know very little of the matter, who impute the success of modern
inoculators to any superior skill, either in preparing the patient or
communicating the disease. Some of them indeed, from a sordid desire of
engrossing the whole practice to themselves, pretend to have
extraordinary secrets or nostrums for preparing persons for inoculation,
which never fail of success. But this is only a pretence calculated to
blind the ignorant and inattentive. Common sense and prudence alone are
sufficient both in the choice of the subject and management of the
operation. Whoever is possessed of these may perform this office for his
children whenever he finds it convenient, provided they be in a good
state of health.
This sentiment is not the result of theory, but of observation. Though
few physicians have had more opportunities of trying inoculation in all
its different forms, so little appears to me to depend on those,
generally reckoned important circumstances, of preparing the body,
communicating the infection by this or the other method, &c. that for
several years past I have persuaded the parents or nurses to perform the
whole themselves, and have found that method followed with equal
success, while it is free from many inconveniences that attend the
other[93].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account