Any study of the subject of domestic service must lead to the conclusion
that household service and household employments do not occupy an
isolated position; that while they may be indifferent to the political,
industrial, and social changes constantly occurring, they cannot
by virtue of this indifference remain unaffected by them; that the
inventions of the past hundred years have revolutionized household
employments, and that the present generation must adapt itself to
these new conditions; that while a century ago domestic service had no
competitors as an occupation for women, it now has hundreds; that the
personnel in the domestic service of America has been transformed through
industrial, political, and social revolutions; that it has been affected
by the democratic tendencies of the age and by the commercial and
educational development of the country; that because of these constantly
recurring changes in the conditions surrounding domestic service the
questions connected with it vary from year to year; that it is governed
by the same general economic laws as are all other employments, and that
it has developed within itself other economic laws peculiar to it; that
the increasing wealth and luxury of the country are introducing new
complications into a problem already far from simple; that both employer
and employee are heirs of conditions which their ancestors could not
control, and that they are surrounded by difficulties which no person
single-handed and alone can hope successfully to overcome.
It has been seen that many of these difficulties arise from the failure
to recognize domestic service as a part of the great industrial questions
of the day. It is not so recognized because economic writers have not as
yet discussed the subject, and because those who come in daily contact
with it overlook its economic side. The housekeeper who completes her
round of morning shopping by a visit to an employment bureau where she
engages a new cook regards that and her other business transactions all
in the same light; she has both in shopping and in securing a cook been
guided solely by her taste, her necessities, and her bank account. The
economist must include domestic service in his discussions of the labor
question, and the housekeeper must differentiate the various parts of her
housekeeping duties before improvement is possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account