The European employer of domestic labor is at a distinct advantage in
comparison with the employer of such labor in America in that little or
no baking is done in the individual household, and washing as a rule is
done out of the house,[335] or if done in it, is often made a serious
matter like the semi-annual housecleaning,[336] while the continental
breakfast of coffee and rolls practically reduces the first meal of the
day to a negative quantity.
It is indeed an open question whether the simplification of household
work thus secured is not more than counterbalanced by the lack of modern
conveniences for doing housework, by the absence of any system of uniform
heating and the consequent necessity of carrying fuel to every room that
is to be warmed, by the absence of elevators and the hard work thereby
entailed on employer and employee alike, and by the necessity apparently
encumbent on every member of many households of crocheting endless yards
of trimming, working on canvas, and storing away for future use countless
piles of household linen. But these are at least variations from our own
problem, and both employer and employee in Europe have certain advantages
in their work even if these are counterbalanced by corresponding
disadvantages.
The employer in Europe, especially in Germany, is at an advantage in
being able, indeed often compelled by law, to make a contract specifying
the term of service for which the employee is engaged. In Germany[337]
contracts are usually made in the city by the quarter, in the country
by the year. If the contract is made by the quarter, notice of a change
on either side must be given six weeks in advance; if made by the year,
three months’ notice must be given; where the contract is made for only
a month, notice must be given fourteen days in advance; in all cases
notice must be given before twelve o’clock at noon.[338] If an employee
is dismissed without due notice before the expiration of the contract,
the employer must pay wages and board for the remainder of the time.[339]
If an employee leaves without giving the legal notice, he can be brought
back by the police and be also subject to fine and imprisonment.[340]
Again, it is impossible for a person to engage a servant while in the
employ of another without the knowledge and consent of the latter, while
any one who entices a servant away from his place is subject to fine and
imprisonment.[341]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account