[170] _Views of Society and Manners in America_, pp. 338-342.
[171] _Arrivals of Alien Passengers and Immigrants in the United States
from 1820 to 1890_, pp. 16, 23.
By the _Census of Massachusetts_ for 1885 it is seen that forty-nine per
cent of all women in that state of foreign birth are Irish. I., 574-575.
[172] _Ante_, p. 11.
[173] Lowell says of the Irish immigration, “It is really we who have
been paying the rents over there [in Ireland], for we have to pay higher
wages for domestic service to meet the drain.”—_Letters_, II., 336.
A racy discussion of the influence of the Irish cook in the American
household is given by Mr. E. L. Godkin under the title “The Morals and
Manners of the Kitchen,” in _Reflections and Comments_, p. 56.
[174] _Arrivals of Alien Passengers and Immigrants in the United States
from 1820 to 1890_, pp. 15, 22.
[175] Women constituted 41.8 per cent of the total number of German
immigrants arriving here during the twenty-two years ending June 30,
1890; the Irish forming 48.5 per cent.—_Ibid_., p. 11.
[176] The United States Census for 1890 gives the number of domestic
servants born in Ireland as 168,993; the number born in Germany was
95,007.
[177] The number of Chinese in domestic service in 1890 was 16,439.
[178] Walker, _Wages_, pp. 376-377.
[179] An illustration of these various changes is seen in the case of one
employee, who was born in Ireland, engaged in service in New York, and
afterwards drifted to Minnesota, where the report was made.
[180] This is indicated by the various definitions given in early
dictionaries. It is a curious fact that _The New World of Words or
General English Dictionary_, large quarto, third edition, London,
1671, does not contain the word “servant.” Phillips’ _Universal
English Dictionary_, London, 1720, has “_servant_, a man or woman
who serves another.” Bailey’s _Dictionary_, London, 1721, 1737, and
1770, defines servant as “one who serves another.” _The Royal Standard
English Dictionary_, first American edition, Worcester, Massachusetts,
1788, “being the first work of the kind printed in America,” defines
_servant_ as “one who serves.” The second edition, Brookfield, 1804, has
“_servant_, one who serves for wages.”
Some interesting illustrations of this early use of the word are found in
colonial literature. Thus Thomas Morton in his _New English Canaan_, p.
179, says, “In the month of June Anno Salutis, 1622, it was my chance to
arrive in the parts of New England with thirty servants and provisions of
all sorts fit for a plantation.”
Governor Bradford in his _History of Plymouth_, pp. 235-236, speaks
of “Captaine Wolastone and with him 3. or 4. more of some eminencie,
who brought with them a great many servants, with provisions & other
implments fit for to begine a plantation.”
A “Narrative concerning the settlement of New England,” 1630, says,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account