Still another advantage is the legal protection offered domestic
employees, although as Mr. James Schouler well says, the relation
of master and servant is in theory hostile to the genius of free
institutions, since it bears the marks of social caste. “It may be
pronounced as a relation of more general importance in ancient than
in modern times and better applicable at this day to English than to
American society.”[251] But technically, the relation according to
Chancellor Kent is a legal status resting entirely on contract. One
agrees to work and the other to pay, but both are on an equality as far
as rights are concerned.[252] The legal rights accorded a servant are
freedom from physical punishment,[253] proper food and support in illness
or disability during the time of employment,[254] the right to the
enjoyment of a good character—provided she has one—and the law presumes
she has it until the contrary appears,[255] wages, if the servant has
performed his part of the contract,[256] and damages in case of discharge
before the expiration of the contract.[257]
These advantages which domestic service as an occupation has over most
other employments are patent. They would be recognized by all, whether
domestic employees or not, as the accompaniments of the service as it
exists under reasonably favorable conditions. They are advantages
which, with the exception of the home privileges, are independent of the
personal character and disposition of employers. They are apparently
inherent in the occupation, as much to be expected as are free Sundays
and evenings after six o’clock in mills and factories. They are the
inducements which, when a choice has been possible, have led intelligent
women to become household employees. They are the advantages that have
been repeatedly set forth by the press and the pulpit to sewing-women
and shop-girls working at the starvation limit of wages in large cities
to induce them to better their condition. Unquestionably many such women
would be far better off than they are now if they were in comfortable
domestic service. It has been said by the head of one of our great
labor bureaus that all questions concerning wage-earning women resolve
themselves into those of “wages, hours, health, and morals,” and domestic
service conforms to all the requirements that could be demanded under
these four heads, with the possible exception of hours under unfavorable
conditions. But, notwithstanding these advantages, women in cities still
prefer sewing, country girls drift into mills and factories, teachers’
agencies are crowded with applicants who can never secure a position and
could not fill one if obtained; there must be something else involved in
the question besides the matter of “wages, hours, health, and morals.”
CHAPTER VIII
THE INDUSTRIAL DISADVANTAGES OF DOMESTIC SERVICE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account