Some parts of Juan’s history, which Rumour, That live gazette, had scatter’d to disfigure, She had heard; but women hear with more good humour Such aberrations than we men of rigour: Besides, his conduct, since in England, grew more Strict, and his mind assumed a manlier vigour; Because he had, like Alcibiades, The art of living in all climes with ease. His manner was perhaps the more seductive, Because he ne’er seem’d anxious to seduce; Nothing affected, studied, or constructive Of coxcombry or conquest: no abuse Of his attractions marr’d the fair perspective, To indicate a Cupidon broke loose, And seem to say, ‘Resist us if you can’— Which makes a dandy while it spoils a man. They are wrong—that ’s not the way to set about it; As, if they told the truth, could well be shown. But, right or wrong, Don Juan was without it; In fact, his manner was his own alone; Sincere he was—at least you could not doubt it, In listening merely to his voice’s tone. The devil hath not in all his quiver’s choice An arrow for the heart like a sweet voice. By nature soft, his whole address held off Suspicion: though not timid, his regard Was such as rather seem’d to keep aloof, To shield himself than put you on your guard: Perhaps ’twas hardly quite assured enough, But modesty ’s at times its own reward, Like virtue; and the absence of pretension Will go much farther than there’s need to mention. Serene, accomplish’d, cheerful but not loud; Insinuating without insinuation; Observant of the foibles of the crowd, Yet ne’er betraying this in conversation; Proud with the proud, yet courteously proud, So as to make them feel he knew his station And theirs:—without a struggle for priority, He neither brook’d nor claim’d superiority. That is, with men: with women he was what They pleased to make or take him for; and their Imagination ’s quite enough for that: So that the outline ’s tolerably fair, They fill the canvas up—and ‘verbum sat.’ If once their phantasies be brought to bear Upon an object, whether sad or playful, They can transfigure brighter than a Raphael. Adeline, no deep judge of character, Was apt to add a colouring from her own: ’Tis thus the good will amiably err, And eke the wise, as has been often shown. Experience is the chief philosopher, But saddest when his science is well known: And persecuted sages teach the schools Their folly in forgetting there are fools. Was it not so, great Locke? and greater Bacon? Great Socrates? And thou, Diviner still, Whose lot it is by man to be mistaken, And thy pure creed made sanction of all ill? Redeeming worlds to be by bigots shaken, How was thy toil rewarded? We might fill Volumes with similar sad illustrations, But leave them to the conscience of the nations.