Dorothy Harcourt's secret : $b Sequel to "A deed without a name"Southworth, Emma Dorothy Eliza Nevitte
General
Dorothy Harcourt's secret : $b Sequel to "A deed without a name"
Southworth, Emma Dorothy Eliza Nevitte
American fiction -- 19th century
“Certainly. It was I who found the child, and through the intervention
of a good woman, full of tact and delicacy, learned as much of the
little one’s story as could be drawn from a creature of her tender
years. I learned, in short, that the little Owlet was an orphan who had
been adopted by Miss Fronde, between whom and herself there seemed to
have been a strong bond of affection.”
“Well, sir,” said the lawyer in the same icy tone.
“It was I who wired you of the discovery of the lost child.”
“Under a false name, then,” said the lawyer scornfully.
“Not exactly, but under my own first name,” said Harcourt patiently.
“Well, sir, I answered your telegram in sufficiently clear terms, I
think.”
“Yes; but—pray pardon me—your answer came in a few hours after my
dispatch. Did you really have time to communicate with Miss Fronde on
the subject before answering my telegram?”
“No. I relied upon my own responsibility as her solicitor, with perfect
knowledge of her relations to the adopted child, as well as of all her
other business, and I considered my course in the matter conclusive.”
“Yes,” said the young man, still very forbearingly, “and that would have
settled the question as to what should be done with the forsaken orphan,
and I should myself have taken care of her, had not a message come
summoning me immediately to the sick bed of my dear mother, to whom I am
even now en route, only waiting for the train that will start in less
than two hours for West Virginia.”
“I am sorry to hear that Mrs. Harcourt is ill,” said the lawyer,
softened a little by the sorrow and patience of his young visitor.
“Thank you, sir. Under such circumstances I really did not know what to
do with the forlorn child, except to bring her along with me.”
“And you have really brought her here?” demanded the lawyer in surprise.
“I could not do otherwise. The little creature was and is, wild to
return to her benefactress. I thought possibly, under the circumstances,
that Miss Fronde might reconsider her resolution to have nothing further
to do with the child, and reflect that the orphan’s abduction was her
great misfortune rather than her fault.”
“You are mistaken. Miss Fronde formed no such determination. If you
recall the terms of my telegram, you will find that I merely said that
Miss Fronde could not interfere in the case of the child. And, in fact,
sir, she had no right to do so.”
“No right? May I be permitted to ask why she had no right?” Harcourt
inquired.
The lawyer dismissed the question with a wave of his hand and said:
“I am by no means sure, however, that since the little one has been
lost, and found again, Miss Fronde may not be willing, and even well
pleased, to receive her back again. She was certainly very fond of
little Owlet. However, that can be easily ascertained, as Miss Fronde is
now in Washington.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account