"This stranger--this Mr Robert Durnford--gave you an address, you say--
a London address? Did you ever apply at that address?"
"It was only a post-office address. I lost no time in writing to him at
it."
"What was the address?"
"It was some London post office. The name of the post office has clean
escaped my memory."
"You wrote to him. And you received no reply?"
"Pardon me. I did receive one."
"May I ask to what effect?"
"To the effect that the writer was on the eve of departure to New South
Wales, and regretting that therefore our further acquaintance must
remain in abeyance perhaps for years--also expressing gratification at
having been instrumental in my daughter's escape. It was a courteous
and kindly letter. I have heard nothing of him since."
"Quite so, Dr Ingelow--quite so. Have you still that letter in your
possession?"
"No. I have destroyed it, among other old papers."
"Lately?"
"N-no. It must be quite a year ago."
"Now, you are on your oath, Dr Ingelow. You have not destroyed that
letter since your son-in-law's arrest?"
"Your reminder is needless, sir. Nevertheless, for your greater
satisfaction I will reiterate that the letter was destroyed quite a year
ago."
"Well, well. Now did it strike you at the time that any similarity
existed between that stranger and the prisoner, Roland Dorrien?"
"It did not."
"No resemblance whatever? Voice--walk--manner? Come. Think again, my
dear sir."
"Unnecessary. I saw no such resemblance."
"Has it ever struck you since?"
"It has not."
"You have never had reason to suspect that Robert Durnford, the rescuer
of your daughter on that occasion, might have been Roland Dorrien in
disguise?"
"I never have."
"You distinctly swear to that?"
"Distinctly."
"Don't you think, Mr Benham, you've got out of this witness all you're
likely to get?" said the judge snappishly.
"I have just put my last question, m'lord," was the suave reply. "Thank
you, Dr Ingelow." And Mr Benham sat down, more nonplussed than he
cared to show.
Mr Windgate rose.
"I should be glad, my lord, if you would kindly make a note of the fact
that this witness has three times distinctly sworn that no identity
existed between the stranger, Robert Durnford, and my client, Roland
Dorrien."
"Er--twice I think, Mr Windgate," said the judge.
"Pardon me, my lord. Three times. If your lordship will glance back a
few folios. This gentleman stated earlier in his evidence that from
August till the following June he had not set eyes on the prisoner.
Now, the young lady's adventure befel in February, between those months.
Therefore the statement amounts to a denial of the identity."
"Very well, Mr Windgate."
"Thank you, m'lord. I do not require to cross-examine."
So the rector stood down. Mr Windgate was jubilant. The evidence just
heard was all in his client's favour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account