The curate had not been at first subpoenaed. But so urgent had become
the need of more testimony that the defence had decided at the last
moment to put Turner into the box. The latter looked not a little
nervous. Truth to tell, the situation was one of horror to his
immaculate soul. He did not fancy being mixed up in criminal trials, as
he subsequently put it.
"Now, Mr Turner," went on Mr Windgate, after a few preliminary
questions. "I believe you took part in the search for Miss Olive
Ingelow, who was cut off by the tide on this coast some two-and-a-half
years ago?"
"Yes, I did."
"And you found her?"
"We were so fortunate."
"Kindly tell the Court how and where you found her."
Turner complied in as few words as possible.
"Now, did it strike you that this stranger you mention--this person who
rescued the young lady, might have been Mr Roland Dorrien disguised?"
"Never."
"Never? Then or since?"
"Neither then nor since," answered Turner decidedly.
"Did you ever hear that it struck anybody?"
"Never."
"Yet you knew Roland Dorrien well?"
"Fairly well."
"Dr Ingelow, the lady's father, took part in the search, did he not?"
"Yes."
"And he remarked no likeness?"
"Not that I am aware of."
"You saw a great deal of Dr Ingelow at that time?"
"Yes."
"And he never mentioned any such suspicion?"
"Never."
"One moment, Mr Turner," said the Crown counsel, rising to
cross-examine. "This lady is now the prisoner's wife, is she not?"
"She is."
"Didn't it strike you as rather--well, queer--the stranger Durnford
suddenly leaving you all in the way he did?"
"A little perhaps. But we supposed he knew his own business best. And
some people _are_ queer."
"A--quite so--Mr Turner, I quite agree with you--they are," said Mr
Benham waggishly. "That will do, thank you."
"That's my defence, my lord," said Mr Windgate.
CHAPTER FORTY SIX.
LIFE OR DOOM?
The prisoner, re-entering after the adjournment for lunch, found himself
idly wondering whether, when next he should pass through the dock gate,
it would be as a free man or as one whose days were numbered. Then,
amid the intense hush that followed on his appearance, he heard his
counsel opening his address to the jury, which, put into a good humour
by a few deft if stereotyped compliments, began to think that after all
there might be a good deal to be said on the side of the defence.
Before brushing aside the flimsy testimony which seemed to tell against
the accused, for the prosecution had relied upon quantity to
counterbalance an utter absence of quality, began Mr Windgate, he would
show what manner of man it was whom they were asked to convict of the
gravest crime known to the law. It was all very well for the
prosecution to contend that a gentleman in his client's position was as
liable to commit crime as--say the historic Mr William Sikes. His own
experience--perhaps fully equal to that of his learned brother
opposite--was wholly against any such theory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account