Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation
Inadequately handled, this scene could become grotesque. It ranks
amongst the finest in the book. In theatrical jargon it would be
described as a _utility_, in literature as a _cheville_, but it is
precisely one of the rarest manifestations of Dostoevsky’s artistry.
Like Pushkin he could say, “I have never treated anything lightly,”
which is the hallmark of a great artist, utilizing everything,
transforming disadvantage into opportunity. At this stage the pace
needs must slacken, and every detail that can arrest events in their
precipitancy becomes of supreme importance. The passages where
Dostoevsky describes the arrival, unannounced, of Shatov’s wife, the
conversation between husband and wife, Kirillov’s interposition, and
the prompt establishment of an intimacy between the two men, constitute
perhaps the most moving chapter in the book. We marvel anew at the
utter absence of jealousy I discussed with you on a previous occasion.
Shatov knows that his wife is going to have a child, but the father of
this child she expects is not even mentioned. Shatov is consumed with
love for this suffering creature who can find none but words that wound.
“It was only that fact [i.e. his wife’s reappearance] that saved the
scoundrels from Shatov’s carrying out his intention, and at the same
time helped them to get rid of him. To begin with, it agitated Shatov,
threw him out of his regular routine, and deprived him of his usual
clear-sightedness and caution. Any idea of his own danger would be the
last thing to enter his head at this moment when he was absorbed with
such different considerations.”[127]
But to come back to Kirillov: the time is at hand when Pyotr
Stepanovitch calculates personal advantage from the other man’s
suicide. What grounds has Kirillov for taking his own life? Pyotr
Stepanovitch questions him: he has no clear idea, and is seeking
clumsily to get at the truth. Up till the last minute, he is in terror
lest Kirillov change his mind and thus escape him. But no!
“I won’t put it off. I want to kill myself now,”[128] says Kirillov.
The conversation between Verhovensky and Kirillov is especially
obscure, obscure even in Dostoevsky’s own mind. As we have earlier
observed, Dostoevsky never expresses his ideas as ideas pure and
simple, but always through the medium of his characters who become
their interpreters. Kirillov is in a highly unusual pathological state,
for in a moment or two he is going to take his own life, and his talk
is agitated and incoherent. We are left to unravel in it the clue to
Dostoevsky’s own thought.
The idea which prompts Kirillov’s suicide is of a mystic nature and
closed to Pyotr Stepanovitch’s comprehension.
“If God exists, all is His will, and from His will I cannot escape. If
not, it’s all my will, and I am bound to show self-will.... I am bound
to show myself because the highest point of my self-will is to kill
myself with my own hands....”
“‘God is necessary and so must exist,’ said Kirillov.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account