Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation
“He was simply feeling. Life had stepped into the place of
feeling.”[82] This is the frame of mind in which we find Prince Myshkin
at the beginning of _The Idiot_, a frame of mind which could be, and in
Dostoevsky’s eyes doubtless was, the Christian state _par excellence_.
I shall revert to this point.
Dostoevsky seems to establish in the human soul--or simply recognizes
as already existing--a kind of stratification. I can distinguish
in the characters of his novels three strata or regions. First the
intellectual, remote from the soul and whence proceed the worst
temptations. Therein dwells, according to Dostoevsky, the treacherous
demonic element. For the moment I am concerned only with the second
region, the region of passion, ravaged and desolated by storms; but
tragic though the happenings be that these storms determine, the very
soul of Dostoevsky’s characters is scarcely affected. There is a
region deeper still, where passion exists not. This is the region that
resurrection (and I grant the word the full significance bestowed on
it by Tolstoy), re-birth, in Christ’s words, enables us to reach as
Raskolnikov reached it. In this region Myshkin lives and moves.
The transition from _The Idiot_ to the _Eternal Husband_ is more
interesting still. You surely remember that at the close of _The Idiot_
we leave Prince Myshkin at the bedside of Nastasya Filippovna whom her
lover Rogozhin, the prince’s rival, has just murdered. There stand the
rivals, face to face, close to each other. Will they kill each other?
No, indeed! They weep together, and spend a wakeful night stretched out
side by side at the foot of Nastasya’s bed.
“Every time the delirious man (Rogozhin) broke into screaming or
babble, he hastened to pass his trembling hand softly over his hair and
cheeks, as though caressing and soothing him.”[83]
Almost the theme of _The Eternal Husband_! _The Idiot_ dates from 1868,
_The Eternal Husband_ from 1870. Some men of letters--and as clever a
critic as Marcel Schwob was amongst them--consider the latter novel
Dostoevsky’s masterpiece. His masterpiece! Perhaps that is excessive.
But, at any rate, it is _a masterpiece_, and it is interesting to hear
what Dostoevsky himself had to say about the book.
“I have a story,” he wrote to his friend Strakhov on March 18, 1869,
“not a very long one. I had already thought of writing it three or
four years ago, the year my brother died, encouraged by some words of
Apollon Gregoriev who, praising my _Notes from Underground_, said to
me, ‘Just write something in this style.’ But it will be something
quite different, as far as form goes: the foundation, however, will
still be the same. My everlasting theme.... I can write the story very
quickly, because there is not a word or line of it but what is clear to
me. It is already written in my head, although nothing is down on paper
so far.”[84]
And in a letter dated October 27, 1869, he continues:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account