Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881; Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation
Strange, is it not, to find what I may term a first version of the
queer relationship between Ivan Karamazov the thinker and Smerdiakov
the lackey in _Crime and Punishment_, the first of his great novels?
Dostoevsky tells us of one Filka, a serf, Svidrigaïlov’s servant, who
hanged himself to escape, not blows, but his master’s mockery of him.
“Filka was a sort of hypochondriac, a sort of domestic philosopher.”
The other servants used to say “he read himself silly.”[107]
These lackeys, these shadows, these puppets that act in place of the
thinking beings, have one and all a love amounting to veritable
devotion for the diabolical superiority of intellect. Stavrogin’s
prestige in the eyes of Pyotr Stepanovitch is as exaggerated as that
intellectual’s scorn for his miserable inferior.
“‘Do you want the whole truth?’ said Pyotr Stepanovitch to Stavrogin.
‘You see the idea really did cross my mind--you hinted it yourself,
not seriously, but teasing me (for of course you would not hint it
seriously); but I couldn’t bring myself to it, and wouldn’t bring
myself to it for anything, not for a hundred roubles....’
“In the heat of his talk, he went close up to Stavrogin and took hold
of the revers of his coat (really, it may have been on purpose). With
a violent movement Stavrogin struck him on the arm: ‘Come, what is it?
... give over, you’ll break my arm.’”[108] (Ivan Karamazov’s conduct
towards Smerdiakov is marked by like brutality.)
“Nicolay Vsyevolodovitch, tell me, as before God, are you guilty or
not, and I’ll swear I’ll believe your word as though it were God’s, and
I’ll follow you to the end of the earth. Yes, I will, I’ll follow you
like a dog.... I am a buffoon, but I don’t want you, my better half, to
be one! Do you understand me?”[109]
The thinking being enjoys his domination of the other: yet this very
domination is a source of constant exasperation. For his creature’s
fumbling actions are served up as the caricature of his own thoughts.
Dostoevsky’s letters enlighten us concerning the elaboration of his
novels, _The Possessed_ in particular. Personally, I judge this work
to be most extraordinarily powerful and wonderful. In it we are
vouchsafed to witness a rare literary phenomenon. The book Dostoevsky
planned to write was very different from that we actually have. While
he was putting it into shape a new character, of which at first he
had scarcely dreamed, asserted itself, gradually took front rank, and
ousted the intended hero!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account