[19] Who would believe this from the specimens tasted in England? Yet we
are assured the statement is perfectly true.
[20] Patterson’s _Travels in Caffraria_, p. 92.
[21] One of these inspired Longfellow, who thinks (poetically) the
richest wine is that of the West, which grows by the beautiful river,
whose sweet perfume fills the apartment, with a benison on the giver:—
“Very good in its way is the Verzenay,
Or the Sillery, soft and creamy;
But Catawba wine has a taste more divine,
More dulcet, delicious, and dreamy.”
A dreamy taste is something startling even in poetical description.
[22] Chili has lately taken Paris medals for its wines; it also produces
a light and wholesome beer.
[23] The _rébêche_ is principally sold to people manufacturing cheap
Champagnes; by mixing with other wines of very light complexion, they
give them body, and make a stuff which can be produced at a very low
price.
[24] _De Proprietatibus Rerum._ Argent. 1485, lib. xix. cap. 56.
[25] Blount’s _Fragmenta Antiquitatis_. Sec. “Grand Serjeantry,” No. IV.
[26] _The Wines of the World, Characterized and Classed_, 1875, pp. 16,
17.
[27] This wine is said to profit much by a quiescent state of the air
afforded by the town wall.
[28] A wine at Homburg, called _Erlacher_, at about one mark a bottle,
is, says Dr. Charnock, frequently superior to the ordinary _Niersteiner_.
[29] “Hock,” says one of those wine circulars, which weary alike the
postman and the public, “is the English name for the noble vintages of
the Rhine, which afford models of what wine ought to be. Their purity is
attested by their durability. They are almost imperishable. They increase
appetite, they exhilarate without producing languor, and they purify
the blood. The Germans say good Hock keeps off the doctor. Southey says
it deserves to be called the Liquor of Life. And so Pindar would have
called it, if he had ever tasted it.” Nothing surely can be added to this
description of its virtues.
[30] Thus unfortunately translated, “Rhine wine is good, Neckar pleasant,
Frankfort bad, Moselle innocent.” But Moselle, we have been told, is very
far from “innocent.” _Unnosel_ is without bouquet. _Tranken_ means not
bad but drinkable, and _lecker_ is rather lickerish than good. A sample
of the same carelessness occurs on the next page, where _ein weinfask
von anderhalb ahm ein pipe_ is intended to express _ein Weinfass von
anderthalb Ohm, eine Pipe_. It is a pity that an excellent work, to which
we, as many writers on wine like ourselves, have been deeply indebted,
should be marred by these irregularities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account