That the human voice is capable of at one and the same time expressing four moods so different from each other, shows that there are various factors (all of a different nature) simultaneously at work producing these different results. To correctly indicate these four characteristics, it would be necessary to mark each syllable in a fourfold manner. I shall confine myself to the rhythm and the metre, and shall mark the former above the line by using the signs for accent (´`), and the latter below the line by using those for metre (¯˘). Right here is the main stumbling-block with persons of either nationality in speaking the language of the other. They will in so doing invariably retain the idiomatic expression of their own vernacular. The _proper_ way to illustrate the rhythm would be as follows: ´`´` ´` ´` ´` Vater, Mutter, gut. `´ `´ `´ `´ `´ Father, Mother, good. There is always a rise of the voice before its fall in German, and a fall before its rise in English _for each and every syllable_. When a language is well spoken, this complete intonation is always heard. If this needs illustration, which it should not, being so obvious, the poetry of both peoples offers proofs in great abundance. It is a notable fact that, with German verse, the voice for the end syllable always sinks, with English it rises; the former is generally short, the latter long; but even where the word ends with a long syllable in German the voice falls at the end, and where one ends with a short syllable in English the voice rises at the end. To anxiously count every syllable in poetry is contrary to the spirit of a language. There are slight touches here and there which simply serve as connecting links, and which, in marking the rhythmic flow of sounds, should not be included as belonging to the metre. Most of these are prefixes or affixes, pauses for repose or relaxation, consisting in scarcely noticeable inspirations or expirations, which are necessary to strengthen the voice for the actual metre. The various intonations are generally expressed by the use of the signs for long and short only. As the latter, properly speaking, only represent time or measure, the voice is left to express as best it may and without any guidance whatsoever every other factor composing a language. All I want to do now is to show by the signs for the accent the difference between the English and German rhythmic movement: ´ ` ´ ` ´ ` ´ ` Auf der duftverlornen Grenze ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ´ ` ´ ` ´ ` ´ ` Jener Berge tanzen hold ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ¯ ´ ` ´ ` ´ ` ´ ` Abendwolken ihre Taenze ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ´ ` ´ ` ´ ` ´ ` Leicht geschuerzt im Strahlengold. ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ¯ ˘ ¯ LENAU.