Bim’s easy injunction to sleep was not so easily followed by the man
who was a self-appointed prisoner. On his bed Grant tossed in a fever
of mingled blind speculation and outraged pride. Strive though he might
to palliate Benicia’s charge against him on the score of the girl’s
complete prostration through the night’s tragedy, the quick and fiery
blood in her that was inheritance from Spanish forebears, yet always he
came against the same ugly fact: one whom he loved with all the passion
in him and whose return of love he had dared hope to win had accused
him of murder out of hand.
Yet how could he prove his innocence? Of a sudden that thought plumped
down on him with the burst of a high explosive shell.
Benicia’s accusation had appeared monstrous, yes. But, look upon
the facts through her eyes--so a curiously impersonal phase of mind
prompted; what were those facts as they appeared to the girl? A man
who was first a chance acquaintance in a train and then, by a trick
of fate, a guest in the house, rouses the household at three o’clock
in the morning by sounding an alarm in the patio. He calls “Murder!”
though he does not say who has been murdered, he has not apparently
discovered the body of Don Padraic in his chamber.
This man--this waif brought in from the desert--prevents the daughter’s
going in to the room of death until first he has entered that room
and locked the door behind him. He leaves the marks of his fingers in
blood upon the outside of that door. Then he and his friend--“call him
confederate” was Grant’s cynical amendment--organize a hue and cry
outside of the house. While this is in progress a servant finds in the
guest’s room a dagger; instead of being in its usual place amid the
rack of weapons on the wall this dagger lies on the floor as if hastily
thrown there by one who had no proper time for its concealment. The
dagger is blood stained and on its haft are the same finger prints as
those on the door of the dead don’s chamber.
There was the record. How refute it?
Say that while lying awake he saw a hand appear at the bars of his
window and heard the tinkle of a knife dropped within? Why, if he was
so vigilant at three o’clock in the morning, had he not seen that hand
of a murderer steal in to abstract the weapon before the deed? And
whose hand was it? Did not the burden of proof that it was not his own
which took the dagger from the wall rest solely upon Grant Hickman?
Another’s finger prints on that bloodied haft besides his own?
Perhaps. But it needed the instruments of precision of a detective
central office to juggle with such minutiæ as the whorls and spirals
in a finger print, and they most certainly were lacking at the Casa
O’Donoju. Graver difficulty still, there were a hundred and more
Indians in the oasis; how gather them all together and take the prints
of their fingers?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account