qualities, must of necessity be cold. But, nevertheless, the habitual
use of the terms “_the_ warm” and “_the_ cold” is an accommodation to
Aristotle’s own system. In Parmenides himself they were simply one pair
of attributes amongst others.
Footnote 461:
_Met._ Α, 5. 986 b 34, θερμὸν καὶ ψυχρόν; _Phys._ Α, 5. 188 a 20;
_Gen. Corr._ Α, 3. 318 b 6; Β, 3. 330 b 14.
Still more misleading is Aristotle’s identification of these with Fire
and Earth. It is not quite certain that he meant to say Parmenides
himself made this identification; but, on the whole, it is most likely
that he did, and Theophrastos certainly followed him in this.[462] It is
another question whether it is accurate. Simplicius, who had the poem
before him (§ 85), after mentioning Fire and Earth, at once adds “or
rather Light and Darkness”;[463] and this is suggestive enough. Lastly,
Aristotle’s identification of the dense element with “what is not,”[464]
the unreal of the First Part of the poem, is not very easy to reconcile
with the view that it is earth. On the other hand, if we suppose that
the second of the two “forms,” the one which should not have been
“named,” is the Pythagorean Air or Void, we get a very good explanation
of Aristotle’s identification of it with “what is not.” We seem, then,
to be justified in neglecting the identification of the dense element
with earth for the present. At a later stage, we shall be able to see
how it may have originated.[465] The further statement of Theophrastos,
that the Warm was the efficient cause and the Cold the material or
passive,[466] is intelligible enough if we identify them with the Limit
and the Unlimited respectively; but is not, of course, to be regarded as
historical.
Footnote 462:
_Phys._ Α, 5. 188 a 21, ταῦτα δὲ (θερμὸν καὶ ψυχρὸν) προσαγορεύει πῦρ
καὶ γῆν; _Met._ Α, 5. 986 b 34, οἷον πῦρ καὶ γῆν λέγων. Cf. Theophr.
_Phys. Op._ fr. 6 (_Dox._ p. 482; R. P. 121 a). [Plut.] _Strom._ fr. 5
(_Dox._ p. 581), λέγει δὲ τῆν γῆν τοῦ πυκνοῦ καταρρυέντος ἀέρος
γεγονέναι. Zeller, p. 568, n. 1 (Eng. trans. p. 593, n. 2).
Footnote 463:
_Phys._ p. 25, 15, ὡς Παρμενίδης ἐν τοῖς πρὸς δόξαν πῦρ καὶ γῆν (ἢ
μᾶλλον φῶς καὶ σκότος).
Footnote 464:
_Met._ Α, 5. 986 b 35, τούτων δὲ κατὰ μὲν τὸ ὂν τὸ θερμὸν τάττει,
θάτερον δὲ κατὰ τὸ μὴ ὄν. See above, p. 208, _n._ 457.
Footnote 465:
See below, Chap. VII. § 147.
Footnote 466:
Theophr. _Phys. Op._ fr. 6 (_Dox._ p. 482; R. P. 121 a), followed by
the doxographers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account