124. Shortly before the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War, the enemies
of Perikles began a series of attacks upon him through his friends.[668]
Pheidias was the first to suffer, and Anaxagoras was the next. That he
was an object of special hatred to the religious party need not surprise
us, even though the charge made against him does not suggest that he
went out of his way to hurt their susceptibilities. The details of the
trial are somewhat obscure, but we can make out a few points. The first
step taken was the introduction of a psephism by Diopeithes—the same
whom Aristophanes laughs at in _The Birds_[669]—enacting that an
impeachment should be brought against those who did not practise
religion, and taught theories about “the things on high.”[670] What
happened at the actual trial is very differently related. Our
authorities give hopelessly conflicting accounts.[671] It is no use
attempting to reconcile these; it is enough to insist upon what is
certain. Now we know from Plato what the accusation was.[672] It was
that Anaxagoras taught the sun was a red-hot stone, and the moon earth;
and we shall see that he certainly did hold these views (§ 133). For the
rest, the most plausible account is that he was got out of prison and
sent away by Perikles.[673] We know that such things were possible at
Athens.
Footnote 668:
Both Ephoros (represented by Diod. xii. 38) and the source of Plut.
_Per._ 32 made these attacks immediately precede the war. This may,
however, be pragmatic; they perhaps occurred earlier.
Footnote 669:
_Birds_, 988. Aristophanes had no respect for orthodoxy when combined
with democratic opinions.
Footnote 670:
Plut. _Per._ 32 (R. P. 148), where some of the original words have
been preserved. The phrase τὰ θεῖα and the word μετάρσια are archaisms
from the ψήφισμα.
Footnote 671:
These accounts are repeated by Diog. ii. 12-14. It is worth while to
put the statements of Satyros and Sotion side by side in order to show
the unsatisfactory character of the biographical tradition:—
│ _Sotion._ │ _Satyros._
_Accuser._ │Kleon. │Thoukydides s. of Melesias.
_Charge._ │Calling the sun a red-hot │Impiety and Medism.
│mass. │
_Sentence._ │Fined five talents. │Sentenced to death in absence.
Hermippos represents Anaxagoras as already in prison under sentence of
death when Perikles shamed the people into letting him off. Lastly,
Hieronymos says he never was condemned at all. Perikles brought him
into court thin and wasted by disease, and the judges acquitted him
out of compassion! The Medism alleged by Satyros no doubt comes from
Stesimbrotos, who made Anaxagoras the friend of Themistokles instead
of Perikles. This, too, explains the accuser’s name (Busolt, _Gr.
Gesch._ p. 306, n. 3).
Footnote 672:
_Apol._ 26 d.
Footnote 673:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account