151. The existence of the _antichthon_ was also a hypothesis intended to
account for the phenomena of eclipses. In one place, indeed, Aristotle
says that the Pythagoreans invented it in order to bring the number of
revolving bodies up to ten;[830] but that is a mere sally, and Aristotle
really knew better. In his work on the Pythagoreans, we are told, he
said that eclipses of the moon were caused sometimes by the intervention
of the earth and sometimes by that of the _antichthon_; and the same
statement was made by Philip of Opous, a very competent authority on the
matter.[831] Indeed, Aristotle shows in another passage exactly how the
theory originated. He tells us that some thought there might be a
considerable number of bodies revolving round the centre, though
invisible to us because of the intervention of the earth, and that they
accounted in this way for there being more eclipses of the moon than of
the sun.[832] This is mentioned in close connexion with the
_antichthon_, so there is no doubt that Aristotle regarded the two
hypotheses as of the same nature. The history of the theory seems to be
this. Anaximenes had assumed the existence of dark planets to account
for the frequency of lunar eclipses (§ 29), and Anaxagoras had revived
that view (§ 135). Certain Pythagoreans[833] had placed these dark
planets between the earth and the central fire in order to account for
their invisibility, and the next stage was to reduce them to a single
body. Here again we see how the Pythagoreans tried to simplify the
hypotheses of their predecessors.
Footnote 830:
Arist. _Met._ Α, 5. 986 a 3 (R. P. 83 b).
Footnote 831:
Aet. ii. 29, 4, τῶν Πυθαγορείων τινὲς κατὰ τὴν Ἀριστοτέλειον ἱστορίαν
καὶ τὴν Φιλίππου τοῦ Ὀπουντίου ἀπόφασιν ἀνταυγείᾳ καὶ ἀντιφράξει τοτὲ
μὲν τῆς γῆς, τοτὲ δὲ τῆς ἀντίχθονος (ἐκλείπειν τὴν σελήνην).
Footnote 832:
Arist. _de Caelo_, Β, 13. 293 b 21, ἐνίοις δὲ δοκεῖ καὶ πλείω σώματα
τοιαῦτα ἐνδέχεσθαι φέρεσθαι περὶ τὸ μέσον ἡμῖν ἄδηλα διὰ τὴν
ἐπιπρόσθησιν τῆς γῆς. διὸ καὶ τὰς τῆς σελήνης ἐκλείψεις πλείους ἢ τὰς
τοῦ ἡλίου γίγνεσθαί φασιν· τῶν γὰρ φερομένων ἕκαστον ἀντιφράττειν
αὐτήν, ἀλλ’ οὐ μόνον τὴν γῆν.
Footnote 833:
It is not expressly stated that they were Pythagoreans, but it is
natural to suppose so. Such, at least, was Alexander’s opinion (Simpl.
_de Caelo_, P. 515, 25).
[Sidenote: Planetary motions.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account