(8) This argument, then, is the greatest proof that it is one alone;
but the following are proofs of it also. If there were a many, these
would have to be of the same kind as I say that the one is. For if
there is earth and water, and air and iron, and gold and fire, and if
one thing is living and another dead, and if things are black and
white and all that men say they really are,—if that is so, and if we
see and hear aright, each one of these must be such as we first
decided, and they cannot be changed or altered, but each must be just
as it is. But, as it is, we say that we see and hear and understand
aright, and yet we believe that what is warm becomes cold, and what is
cold warm; that what is hard turns soft, and what is soft hard; that
what is living dies, and that things are born from what lives not; and
that all those things are changed, and that what they were and what
they are now are in no way alike. We think that iron, which is hard,
is rubbed away by contact with the finger;[903] and so with gold and
stone and everything which we fancy to be strong, and that earth and
stone are made out of water; so that it turns out that we neither see
nor know realities. Now these things do not agree with one another. We
said that there were many things that were eternal and had forms and
strength of their own, and yet we fancy that they all suffer
alteration, and that they change from what we see each time. It is
clear, then, that we did not see aright after all, nor are we right in
believing that all these things are many. They would not change if
they were real, but each thing would be just what we believed it to
be; for nothing is stronger than true reality. But if it has changed,
what was has passed away, and what was not is come into being. So
then, if there were many things, they would have to be just of the
same nature as the one. R. P. 147.
(9) Now, if it were to exist, it must needs be one; but if it is one,
it cannot have body; for, if it had body it would have parts, and
would no longer be one. R. P. 146.[904]
(10) If what is real is divided, it moves; but if it moves, it cannot
be. R. P. 144 a.[905]
Footnote 900:
These words come from the beginning of the paraphrase which was so
long mistaken for the actual words of Melissos (Simpl. _Phys._ p. 103,
18; R. P. 142 a), and Diels has accordingly removed them along with
the rest. I believe them to be genuine because Simplicius, who had
access to the complete work, introduces them by the words ἄρχεται τοῦ
συγγράμματος οὕτως, and because they are thoroughly Eleatic in
character. It is quite natural that the first words of the book should
be prefixed to the paraphrase.
Footnote 901:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account