Rather than seek an explanation from agencies exogenous to our earth,
we might perhaps with advantage appeal to the endogenous phenomena of
our planet. When the barometer falls, which we have shown corresponds
to an upward motion of the earth’s crust, we know, from the results of
experiments, that microseismic motions are particularly noticeable.
As a pictorial illustration of what this really means, we may imagine
ourselves to be residing on the loosely fitting lid of a large
cauldron, the relief of the external pressure over which increases the
activity of its internal ebullition—the jars attendant on which are
gradually propagated from their endogenous source to the exterior of
our planet. This travelling outwards would take place much in the same
way that the vibrations consequent to the rattle and jar of a large
factory slowly spread themselves farther and farther from the point
where they were produced.
Admitting an action of this description to take place, it would then
follow that this extra liberation of gaseous material beneath the
earth’s crust would result in an increased upward pressure from within,
and a tendency on the part of the earth’s crust to elevation. If we
accept this as an explanation of the increased activity of a tremor
indicator, then such an instrument may be regarded as a barometer,
measuring by its motions the variations in the internal pressure of our
planet.
The relief of external pressure and the increase of internal pressure,
it will be observed, both tend in the same direction—namely, to an
elevation of the earth’s crust.
This explanation of the increased activity of earth tremors, which
has also been suggested by M. S. di Rossi, is here only advanced as a
speculation, more probable perhaps than many others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account