Earthwork Slips and Subsidences upon Public Works: Their Causes, Prevention, and ReparationNewman, John
Science
Earthwork Slips and Subsidences upon Public Works: Their Causes, Prevention, and Reparation
Newman, John
Earthwork
───────────┬───────────────────────┬───────────┬───────────┬───────────
Height. │ Area. │ Weight of │ Weight of │ Ratio of
Feet. │ │ the │the Train. │the Weight
│ │Embankment.│ Tons. │ of 1 Foot
│ │ Tons per │ │ Lineal of
│ │ Lineal │ │ an
│ │ Foot. │ │Embankment
│ │ │ │ to the
│ │ │ │ Weight of
│ │ │ │the Train.
───────────┼───────────────────────┼───────────┼───────────┼───────────
│Square Lineal Ton. │ │ │
│ Feet. Foot. │ │ │
10 │ 330 × 1 × 0·05 = │ 16·5│ 100 │0·165 to 1
20 │ 960 × 1 × 0·05 = │ 48·0│ 100 │0·480 to 1
30 │1,890 × 1 × 0·05 = │ 94·5│ 100 │0·945 to 1
40 │3,120 × 1 × 0·05 = │ 156·0│ 100 │1·560 to 1
50 │4,650 × 1 × 0·05 = │ 232·5│ 100 │2·325 to 1
60 │6,480 × 1 × 0·05 = │ 324·0│ 100 │3·240 to 1
───────────┴───────────────────────┴───────────┴───────────┴───────────
NOTE.—For the purpose of a comparison of ratios it is not necessary
to consider the length of the train.
A simple inspection of the above ratios would lead to a supposition that
the effects of vibration would be no less than 3·210/0·165 = 19·6 times
greater in a 10 feet than in a 60 feet embankment. Merely comparing the
weight of a train with that of an embankment, and assuming that the
results of vibration at the same rate of speed are so governed is
incorrect, for the effect of vibration at the formation level is not
regulated by the height of an embankment or the depth of a cutting. The
weight of a train may bear a very small relation to that of the quantity
of earth slipped, yet the soil may have gradually become in such a state
of delicate equilibrium that at last the least vibration will destroy
it, even a little of the top soil falling upon the slope; and it
frequently occurs that a slip commences by the detachment of a few small
lumps and increases until it becomes of serious dimensions; therefore,
the area of a cutting or embankment cannot necessarily be considered as
reducing vibration although the source of disturbance may be more
distant; but, of course, the heavier the mass the greater the weight and
speed required to cause the whole to vibrate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account