Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativitySlosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Science
Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativity
Slosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955; Relativity (Physics)
But gravitation seemed indifferent to all these things; it showed no
prejudices or preferences. It attracted with equal force all sorts of
substances, no matter whether they were hot or cold, shiny or black,
moving or still, electrified or magnetized or neither. Other forces and
effects too required time for action at a distance. Sound travels at
the rate of 1,100 feet a second in ordinary air. Light travels at the
rate of 186,337 miles a second in a vacuum. But the force of gravity
seemed not to require any time but to be everywhere, acting all the
while, and nothing could shield it off or shut it out or in any way
interfere with it. The substance or mass of a body as measured by its
weight (the gravitational pull of the earth) was always identical with
its mass as measured by its inertia (its resistance to being set in
motion). All the energies are interchangeable. All other forces could
be reduced or increased, annulled or brought into effect at will.
Not so gravitation. Any bodies of a certain mass placed at a certain
distance apart are always drawn by the same attraction. That is,
gravitation is affected by nothing except geometrical relationships.
This naturally leads us to suspect that gravitation is nothing but
a geometrical relationship, that it is somehow a peculiarity of
space itself. If so, our demand of the physicist that he show us
gravitation,--drag out this mysterious force from its hiding-place
and let us see it--is altogether irrational. It is like a blind man
hunting in a dark cellar at midnight for a black cat that isn’t there.
The geometrician tells us that the internal angles of any triangle
are equal to two right angles. Shall we ask him, what is the force
that makes it so? Shall we refuse to ride on a trolley car until the
electrician can answer our persistent question; “but what _is_
electricity?” When we ask such a question we are really asking him to
tell us what electricity _is not_. To show us what electricity is
he can keep his mouth shut and simply point to the dynamo that produces
it, the wire that conveys it and the motor that consumes it. But what
we secretly mean is that he show us a mechanical model that imperfectly
imitates some of the actions of electricity or a mathematical formula
that will calculate its effects.
Now Einstein seems in the way of making gravitation the foundation of a
new system of geometry. Instead of “explaining” gravitation in terms of
something else he will explain other things in terms of gravitation,
or rather of his space-time manifold of which gravitation is one of the
properties.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account