Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativitySlosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Science
Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativity
Slosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955; Relativity (Physics)
After the lamentable breach in the former international relations
existing among men of science, it is with joy and gratefulness that I
accept this opportunity of communication with English astronomers and
physicists. It was in accordance with the high and proud tradition of
English science that English scientific men should have given their
time and labor, and that English institutions should have provided the
material means, to test a theory that had been completed and published
in the country of their enemies in the midst of war. Although
investigation of the influence of the solar gravitational field on
rays of light is a purely objective matter, I am none the less very
glad to express my personal thanks to my English colleagues in this
branch of science; for without their aid I should not have obtained
proof of the most vital deduction from my theory.
There are several kinds of theory in Physics. Most of them are
constructive. These attempt to build a picture of complex phenomena
out of some relatively simple proposition. The kinetic theory of
gases, for instance, attempts to refer to molecular movement the
mechanical, thermal, and diffusional properties of gases. When we say
that we understand a group of natural phenomena, we mean that we have
found a constructive theory which embraces them.
But in addition to this most weighty group of theories, there is
another group consisting of what I call theories of principle. These
employ the analytic, not the synthetic method. Their starting-point
and foundation are not hypothetical constituents, but empirically
observed general properties of phenomena, principles from which
mathematical formulæ are deduced of such a kind that they apply to
every case which presents itself. Thermodynamics, for instance,
starting from the fact that perpetual motion never occurs in ordinary
experience, attempts to deduce from this, by analytic processes, a
theory which will apply in every case. The merit of constructive
theories is their comprehensiveness, adaptability, and clarity, that
of the theories of principle, their logical perfection, and the
security of their foundation.
The theory of relativity is a theory of principle. To understand it,
the principles on which it rests must be grasped. But before stating
these it is necessary to point out that the theory of relativity is
like a house with two separate stories, the special relativity theory
and the general theory of relativity.
Since the time of the ancient Greeks it has been well known that in
describing the motion of a body we must refer to another body. The
motion of a railway train is described with reference to the ground,
of a planet with reference to the total assemblage of visible fixed
stars. In physics the bodies to which motions are spatially referred
are termed systems of coördinates. The laws of mechanics of Galileo
and Newton can be formulated only by using a system of coördinates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account