Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 2—The Church of the CommonwealthStoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 2—The Church of the Commonwealth
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
Although Owen rose to the Vice-Chancellorship in September, 1652, it
is remarkable that there is no annual oration by him for the year
1653.[245] The circumstance becomes significant on a perusal of
the oration for 1654, and some light is thrown on the state of the
University during the year when the oration was omitted. In 1654, the
speaker pointedly alludes to some extraordinary perils the University
had just survived.[246] There had been a conflict, he said, out of
which the University rose, not with trophies, spoils, and garlands,
but with scars, and with torn standards, dragged in dust. He and his
learned colleagues had fought for what had been handed down from
antiquity--the depository of past ages, and the seed-plot of precious
hopes. They had put to flight wine-shops, ale-sellers, mimics, farces,
buffoons, the public riots, and disgraceful scenes infesting the
streets. Halls and edifices had been deserted and insulted, tottering
to their fall, supporters had gone, props were removed, and things
presented a melancholy spectacle; but God had preserved and wonderfully
restored the University, after winds and storms had assailed it in
vain. Under Owen's rhetorical Latin, so characteristic of the age, we
discover the fact that the former year, when the annual oration had
been omitted, was one of strange confusion in Oxford.
[Sidenote: His Speeches.]
The oration of 1657 further indicates the difficulties of the year
1653, and touches upon some which seemed far more threatening than
any mentioned in the former speech. Five years--said Owen--had passed
since his elevation to office, and for two years after that elevation
the critical situation of the University had been a subject for
astrologers and newspapers--to such a pitch did things arrive that
to have advocated public schools would have been reckoned offensive
to religion. Everything disgraceful was imputed to the advocates of
learning. Affairs were in confusion, and on the edge of the pit, and
the University was saved by a miracle. "When," he adds, "it appeared to
what length audacity, rage, and ignorance would carry those from whom
better things might have been expected, the Supreme Arbiter of Events
so frustrated their efforts in a moment, that with all their strength
they scarcely could take care of themselves who _three days before_
were in the act of devouring us. Nothing remained to these wretched
creatures except great disgrace, everlasting infamy of the unprincipled
attempt upon the seats of learning, which God in His displeasure
averted."[247]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account