Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 2—The Church of the CommonwealthStoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 2—The Church of the Commonwealth
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
wrapped in a dozen flannel napkins, two towels and two table-cloths,
two old shirts, and a carpet; also a little box with his hanging watch;
also an alarum with lines and weights." He was expelled in July.[268]
[Sidenote: _Cambridge University._]
It is somewhat startling, amidst this story of anxieties, ejections,
and impoverishments for conscience' sake, to turn to the oration
delivered by young Isaac Barrow, on Commencement-day, the following
year, 1651, and to hear him speaking thus:--"If it be true, as rumour
tells, that you have so tired of all substantial fare as to nauseate
the banquet of eloquence and the feast of sound philosophy--that
nothing has for you any relish except painted comfits and unmeaning
trifles--that not even wisdom will please you, unless without its
own peculiar flavour; nor truth, unless seasoned with a jest; nor
reason, unless soaked in fun; then in an unlucky hour have I been
assigned as your purveyor, neither born nor bred to such a frivolous
confectionary. The insatiable appetite of laughter keeps itself within
no bounds. Have you crowded to this place for the purpose of listening
and studying, and making progress; or only for the sake of laughing
at this thing, and making a jest of that other? As if folly herself
kept court amongst us--as if here were the market-place and universal
emporium of nonsense, you drink in with greedy ears jibes, and squibs,
and ribaldry, and then, when well considered and improved, set them
all a-circulating again. There is nothing so remote from levity which
you do not instantly--such is your alchemy--transmute into mirth and
absurdity. And let a discourse be such as to move no laughter, nothing
else will please--neither dignity, nor gravity, nor solidity--neither
strength, nor point, nor polish."[269]
One cannot suppose that this description applies to the Fellows or
older members. But it must have been true of undergraduates and other
young men. They--unless Barrow has gone beyond all bounds in his
declamation--were a very noisy, boisterous, laughter-loving set.
In truth, undergraduates were then what undergraduates have been
ever since, full of fun, which at times leaped up in unseemly forms.
Cambridge and Oxford commemorations, in the middle of the seventeenth
century, were no contrasts to Cambridge and Oxford commemorations in
the nineteenth. On reading Barrow's grandiloquent speech, it is easy
to fancy shouts rolling round the hall in wit and humour--not unlike
what our newspapers report of University festivals in our own time.
And although Heads of houses and Fellows would decorously behave
themselves on those occasions--from official prudence no less than from
Puritanical propriety--let it not be supposed that the Puritans were
men who never laughed and joked; for it is remarkable how often in
their memoirs we find allusions to the "facetiousness" of persons, who,
judged of from their portraits, were as solemn as the grave.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account