Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 2—The Church of the CommonwealthStoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 2—The Church of the Commonwealth
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
No reader who has any fixed theological opinions can examine the Church
systems of that age without feeling sympathy with some one of them,
mingled with disapprobation in reference to the rest. The theologian
is constrained to take a side as he studies this deeply-exciting
history. A passionless neutrality is absolutely impossible. At the same
time, a student is chargeable with injustice who does not carefully
strive to ascertain the defects of his own party; and he also is
wanting in charity if he be not ever ready to acknowledge the moral
and spiritual excellencies of persons, whose opinions were different
from those which he himself entertains. When all modifying influences
have been conscientiously analyzed by the catholic-hearted reader of
ecclesiastical history, he will rejoice in believing that the centre
of Christian life is not in creeds, polities, and forms, but in One
Divine Redeemer; and that Herbert and Fuller, Hammond and Baxter,
Taylor and Howe, and the whole company of faithful souls, a few of
whose names have occurred in these volumes, were looking to one and the
same Christ for holiness and peace.
Pictures are drawn of the religion and morals of the Commonwealth
mostly of two kinds; rose-coloured, glowing with brightest tints; or
dark and gloomy, crossed with still deeper shades. Spiritual prosperity
and little else is to be seen in the first; hypocrisy and vice alone
are visible in the second. Party spirit is betrayed in each of these
styles of historical, or rather fictitious art; yet neither serves
its object. For, if there was so much prosperity as is sometimes
represented, how superficial, how slightly-rooted it must have been,
seeing the Restoration of Charles II. swept it almost all away; and
if there was so much of hypocrisy and vice as some declare, it is but
just to ask them, who were the chief hypocrites but the people who
afterwards threw off the mask? Who must have been the most vicious in
secret but those who sinned so very openly when restraint was gone? The
fact is, that neither extreme receives support from a calm review of
facts.
[Sidenote: _State of Religion._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account