Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
III. Episcopal revenues were unequally distributed.[276] The Bishop
of Durham received, in 1670 and afterwards, an annual income of
£3,280; previously to which his resources were so limited, that it was
computed not more than £1,500 remained after he had paid subsidies
and first-fruits. Durham House, in the Strand, had been seized by
Queen Elizabeth; although reclaimed by the Bishop upon her death, it
never again became the episcopal residence; but Aukland Palace, which
used to be to Durham what Croydon used to be to Lambeth, remained in
the Bishops’ possession, and furnished an opportunity for the richest
hospitalities. Ely Place, where Shakespeare’s “good strawberries”
grew in the garden, with its vineyard, meadow, and orchard, had
been appropriated to Sir Christopher Hatton by Queen Elizabeth; yet
Bishop Laney had possession of the palace, and died there in 1675.
The Bishops of Carlisle had long lost Worcester House, in the Strand;
and the prelates of Winchester had leased out “their very fair
house well repaired” (in Southwark), which had “a large wharf and
landing-place,” to occupy a mansion in the suburb of Chelsea.[277] The
provincial palaces of the Bishops surpassed those which they had in
the Metropolis, and were well-known centres of social attraction and
entertainment. Whilst lamentations were poured forth by some over the
robbery and spoliation of sees, so that it was said a mean gentleman of
£200 in land yearly would not exchange his worldly state and condition
with divers Bishops,[278]--Burnet speaks of the extravagance of the
class generally, and represents them as a bad pattern “to all the
lower dignitaries, who generally took more care of themselves than
of the Church.” It is a fact, however, which it would be unjust not
to mention, that many of the Bishops were large contributors to the
repairs of sacred buildings, and to other ecclesiastical objects.
Cosin, for instance, expended the income of the first seven years of
his episcopacy in the improvement of property belonging to the see of
Durham, and in establishing various charitable foundations.
The see of Bristol was extremely poor, and Hereford yielded only
£800 a year.[279] Yet Brian Duppa, after his translation to the see
of Winchester, which he held but a year and a half, is reported to
have received in fines as much as £50,000. Out of this large amount,
however, he remitted £30,000 to his tenants, and expended £16,000 in
acts of charity.[280] Morley disposed of almost all his income in
benefactions. Sheldon’s gifts were computed at upwards of £66,000.[281]
[Sidenote: REVENUES.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account