Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
Another great change at Cambridge, consequent upon the Restoration, is
seen in the decline of Calvinistic theology, the return of Anglican
opinions, and especially the progress of the Latitudinarian schools of
Divinity, described in a subsequent portion of this work. Turning to
less important matters, it may be observed that Royal mandates became
too common, and provoked refusals from the College authorities. Dr.
Cudworth, Master of Christ’s, politely apologized for declining an
order for the election of a son of Sir Richard Fanshaw, as a Fellow,
pleading that “since the Restoration, their little College had received
and obeyed ten Royal letters; and even received a manciple imposed
by letter, though it was a thing never known before.” “When mandates
are so plentifully granted they cannot possibly be all obeyed.”[363]
North set himself decidedly against these mandates, as most mischievous
abuses, and contrived by pre-elections to obviate their occurrence.
“Out of the several years, four or five one under another, he caused
to be pre-elected into fellowships scholars of the best capacities
in the several years; which made it improbable another election
should come about in so many years then next ensuing, for until all
these elections were benefited there could be no vacancy, and that
broke the course of mandates whilst he lived.” North was a High Tory,
an advocate of absolute monarchy, a severe disciplinarian, and an
austere man in his personal habits. Although his opinions accorded
with those prevalent in the University, his conduct as the Head of
a College made him unpopular; and it happened, one evening,--when
sitting in his dining-room by the fire, the chimney being opposite to
the windows, looking out into the great quadrangle,--that a stone was
sent from the court through the window. He was “inwardly vexed, and
soon after, the discourse fell upon the subject of people’s kicking
against their superiors in government, who preserves them as children
are preserved by parents; and then he had a scroll of instances, out of
Greek history, to the same purpose, concluding that no conscientious
magistrate can be popular, but in lieu of that, he must arm himself
with equanimity.” He differed at times from the senior fellows, and
at a meeting for business, when eight of them had determined to have
their own way, and carry a point on which they had previously agreed,
one of them attempted to effect his object by saying, “Master, since
you will not agree, we must rise, and break up the meeting.” “Nay,” he
replied, “that you shall not do, for I myself will rise and be gone
first.”[364] This brought them round. The relation of such an incident
gives an idea of the High Church Don at Cambridge much better than any
general description, and throws amusing light on the social life of the
University.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account