Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
The same habit of thought--avoiding and even protesting against
definite statements of certain doctrines--appears in the _Liberty of
Prophesying_ and in the _Nature of Faith_. The duty of faith,
he remarks, is complete in believing the Articles of the Apostles’
Creed,--“All other things are implicitly in the belief of the Articles
of God’s veracity, and are not necessary in respect of the constitution
of faith to be drawn out, but may there lie in the bowels of the great
Articles, without danger to any thing or any person, unless some other
accident or circumstance makes them necessary.”[411] “This is the great
and entire complexion of a Christian’s faith, and since salvation is
promised to the belief of this creed [I believe that Jesus Christ
is the Son of God] either a snare is laid for us with a purpose to
deceive us--or else nothing is of prime and original necessity to be
believed but this Jesus Christ our Redeemer.”[412] Bearing in mind the
distinction between religion and theology;--and it is to the former
that Taylor seems to refer in his treatise on Faith,--the doctrine,
in substance, may be accepted as sound. But turning to the _Liberty
of Prophesying_ where also the standard raised is the Apostles’
Creed, the question, as his biographer remarks, “becomes much more
difficult, if, as Taylor seems to have meant, and as is implied in
the very title of his discourse, we extend this same principle to
the admission of persons into the public ministry.”[413] In other
words, to treat Theology, which ought to be thoroughly understood by
Christian teachers, as if it were entirely comprehended within the
first simple primitive creed,--as if that creed, regarded as seminally
containing all Christian doctrine, and as actually drawn out by the
study of Scripture, and devout reflection into theological particulars,
were a sufficient standard of orthodoxy for those who are teachers
of others,--betrays a manner of thinking in which scarcely a second
Anglican teacher could be found to agree. There and elsewhere the
Bishop would seem to have found his way within Latitudinarian lines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account