Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
their place of worship muffled up, and sang in suppressed tones one
of Marot’s psalms; and the other in the history of the persecuted
Christians of Madagascar, who when they secretly assembled for Divine
service, were wont to sing in whispers.
[Sidenote: PERSECUTION.]
In November, informers broke into the house of Dr. Annesley, and
distrained his goods for “several latent convictions;”[92] and, a
month afterwards the same people entered his meeting-house and broke
the seats in pieces; after which disturbance, worship was for a time
suspended.[93] Others were treated in a similar manner.[94] The
Bishop of London received orders from Court to require a return of
all parishioners who did not attend church and receive the sacrament,
several of whom were cited to appear in the spiritual court, but “the
Bishop, and divers of his most conspicuous clergy, in the matter of
persecution, carried themselves with great discretion and candour.”[95]
A warrant, however, came out for the apprehension of Dr. Bates; and a
little later, constables were posted at the doors of the “most known
meeting-places in the City, so that there were few sermons in them, at
least at the usual hours.”[96]
[Sidenote: 1682.]
In December fifty warrants for distresses in Hackney were signed;
one for the sum of £500, the others of different amounts, making
up altogether £1,400. Soon afterwards, 200 documents of the same
kind were served upon certain inhabitants of the town of Uxbridge
and its neighbourhood on account of their attending the proscribed
Conventicles.[97] At the same time, it is recorded that “on the Lord’s
Day the Dissenters were in some places in the City kept out, but in
most they met, though they varied hours; few were actually disturbed,
but the difficulties upon them were great.”[98]
Whilst the London informers utterly failed to supply a shadow of proof
that the Nonconformists were engaged in any treasonable designs, other
informers in distant parts of the country strove, with a like want of
evidence, to attach to their Dissenting neighbours the most infamous
suspicions. A clergyman at Kirk Newton had been assaulted by burglars,
who broke open his stable and stole two mares. Immediately a letter
was despatched to the Duke of Newcastle, signed by three persons--who
said, “We must conclude these men to be some fanatics or sent by them;”
the Vicar being “a zealous man for the Church of England and a loyal
person,” the circumstance calls for “some speedy course to suppress
such insolences.”[99]
[Sidenote: PERSECUTION.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account