Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
It has been justly remarked that when his memory ceases to be an object
of veneration “it requires no spirit of prophecy to foretell that
English liberty will be fast approaching to its final consummation;”
and we may add, that no less a Christian than a patriot, he has left
behind a name as dear to English Christians as it is to English
patriots.
We have seen the spirit which prevailed two years before--we have
proofs of its continuance in connection with the last days of Lord
William Russell. That nobleman tenaciously held the principle, that in
some cases it was lawful to resist Government by force. But Churchmen,
who, at the Revolution, in practice approved, if they did not in theory
uphold the doctrine, condemned it at this early period not only as
impolitic, but as irreligious. Tillotson wrote to Russell just before
his execution a letter, in which he said that Christianity plainly
discountenanced the resistance of authority, that in the same law
which establishes our religion, it is declared to be unlawful, under
any pretence whatsoever, to take up arms; and that his Lordship’s
opinion was contrary to the doctrine of all Protestant Churches. He
also pronounced the same opinion to be an offence of a heinous nature,
calling “for a very particular and deep repentance.”[110]
[Sidenote: 1683.]
Tillotson, in this letter, committed himself to the doctrine of passive
obedience; and its publication, without any subsequent denial or
recantation, places him before the world as upholding one main-prop
of the Stuart despotism. Burnet also, by his conduct at the time,
lent his influence to the same side; for, with characteristic haste,
and with that inaccuracy, into which haste so often betrayed him, he
rushed from Russell’s cell at Newgate, saying, that he had converted
his noble friend, who declared his satisfaction in that point to which
Tillotson’s letter relates. Such conduct indicated sympathy at the
time with the opinions in the letter now mentioned; and, therefore, it
involves Burnet in the same responsibility with Tillotson. Russell,
however, soon undeceived both his advisers, insisting that the notion
which he had of the laws, and of the English Government, differed from
that of the two Divines. He died a martyr to the faith, which placed
the Crown of England on the head of the Prince of Orange, whose claims
Tillotson and Burnet afterwards vindicated, and whose conduct they ever
delighted to eulogize.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account