Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
When Churchmen, of moderation and liberality, acted in this way, what
could be expected from Churchmen of a different order? The University
of Oxford having collected from the writings of Puritans, from
Independents, and from political philosophers, sentences which plainly,
or by implication, justified under certain circumstances resistance
to Government, decreed by a vote of Convocation, such propositions to
be false, seditious, and impious,--and most of them also heretical and
blasphemous, infamous to the Christian religion, and destructive of all
good government in Church and State. The books containing such opinions
were forbidden to be read, and ordered to be burnt.[111]
[Sidenote: CONTROVERSY.]
At this juncture it happened that Nonconformists were silent, as
respected political and ecclesiastical controversy, except that John
Howe published a beautiful sermon on the question, “What may most
hopefully be attempted to allay animosities among Protestants, that
our divisions may not be our ruin?” Owen had been overtaken by his
last illness, and Baxter had become tired of disputation. Many of his
brethren were suffering from persecution; and those who were not,
could have controverted the political doctrines of the Church only by
incurring the risk of losing their property, their liberty, or their
life. The Government did everything it could to prevent the expression
of liberal opinions. The quiet habits of most Dissenters, the
cultivation of calm endurance, especially by Quakers, and by others in
a less conspicuous manner, served to promote this remarkable silence--a
silence which, compared with the subsequent Revolution, resembles the
smoothness of the torrent on the edge of the abyss. Nor should it be
forgotten that men who comprehended the dangers of the hour felt,
notwithstanding, immense perplexity as to what they ought to say or do;
since Charles II. pertinaciously professed the greatest moderation,
and declared a love for Parliaments and for the liberties of his
country,--thus by cunning and artifice, showing as great a proficiency
in king-craft as ever his father had done.
[Sidenote: 1683.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account