Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
The disposition of the Government towards Protestant Dissenters appears
in the trial of Richard Baxter. Three weeks after the King’s accession,
this distinguished minister was committed to the King’s Bench, for a
Paraphrase on the New Testament, which he published. On the 18th of
May, being then unwell, he moved for an allowance of further time, in
order to prepare his defence; but in reply to this very reasonable
application, Jeffreys, the Chief Justice, who by his behaviour on the
Bench whilst trying the venerable prisoner, has secured for himself
everlasting infamy, savagely growled out, “I will not give him a
minute’s time more, to save his life.” “Yonder stands Oates in the
pillory, and he says he suffers for the truth, and so says Baxter; but
if Baxter did but stand on the other side of the pillory with him, I
would say, two of the greatest rogues and rascals in the kingdom stood
there.”[144] Twelve days afterwards, Baxter appeared at the bar in
Guildhall, with his friends Sir Henry Ashurst, Dr. Bates, Dr. Sharp,
and Dr. Moore[145] attending by his side; when Jeffreys indulged in
that coarse, vulgar, and well-known rhetoric, a single specimen of
which is sufficient for our purpose. “What ailed the old blockhead, the
unthankful villain, that he would not conform? Was he wiser or better
than other men? He hath been ever since, the spring of the faction. I
am sure he hath poisoned the world with his linsey-woolsey doctrine.
Hang him! this one old fellow hath cast more reproach upon the
constitution and discipline of our Church, than will be wiped off this
hundred years; but I’ll handle him for it; for, by God, he deserves to
be whipped through the City.”
[Sidenote: 1685.]
An eye-witness states, that during this abuse, he himself could
but smile sometimes,--notwithstanding his own tears, and those of
others,--when he saw the Judge imitate “our modern pulpit drollery,”
and drive “on furiously, like Hannibal over the Alps, with fire and
vinegar, pouring all the contempt and scorn upon Baxter, as if he had
been a link-boy or knave.”[146] After the Judge had secured a verdict
from the Jury, the prisoner wrote a letter to the Bishop of London, to
intercede in his behalf. Whether the latter complied with this request,
we do not know; but there is reason to believe that Jeffreys wished to
see the Puritan whipped at the cart-tail, and that the prevention of
the punishment is to be attributed to the interference of his brother
Justices, who might well think it mad and brutal to treat after such
a fashion a man of the highest reputation, and one who had declined
a mitre. But the aged Divine did not escape being fined five hundred
marks, and condemned to imprisonment until he paid the sum. As he
declined to do it, he remained in the King’s Bench until the 24th of
November, 1686, when he obtained release by warrant, upon giving
sureties for his good behaviour.
[Sidenote: REBELLION.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account