Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
Important changes occurred in the Cabinet towards the close of 1685.
Halifax, President of the Council--but no favourite with the King on
account of his opposition to Roman Catholicism, the repeal of the
Test Act, and the Royal foreign policy--was dismissed in the month
of October. In December he was succeeded by Sunderland, who, from
having conformed to Roman Catholic ceremonies at the commencement of
the reign, and from having encouraged his Master in anti-Protestant
proceedings, had succeeded in securing and retaining his good opinion.
There existed a violent Popish party at Court, consisting of the Earl
of Castelmaine, husband to one of Charles’ mistresses,[152] of Henry
Jermyn, created Lord Dover by James II., of the Earl of Tyrconnel,
and of another Irishman, named White. These persons promoted measures
as rash as they were violent, and in so doing acted in concert with
a few Jesuits who dwelt in England, at the head of whom was Father
Petre. The Order at that time had come into collision with the Pontiff,
Innocent XI. They were now in a state of alliance with the French
King, who resisted Ultramontane pretensions, rather than in a state
of obedience to the occupant of St. Peter’s Chair. Then, as it has
happened at other times, parties in a Church which boasts of unity,
were engaged in carrying on the most opposite intrigues: the Jesuits
counselling the English King to set the liberties and wishes of his
subjects at defiance, and to play the despot out-and-out; while the
Roman Court advised him to preserve caution, and to keep within the
lines of the British Constitution. Sunderland united with the Jesuits,
and the other extreme Roman Catholic politicians, in encouraging the
Monarch to follow those ways which ultimately led to his downfall. The
Minister, to strengthen his own position, embraced the King’s religion.
He had before conformed to Catholic rites, but now he professed himself
a decided convert, giving to James the credit of having effected
the change. After the elevation of Sunderland came the dismissal of
Rochester, who had long been a Trimmer, as well as an adviser of
moderation. To recover the good opinion of the King and Queen he
professed to be open to conviction, courted Popish advocates, and
listened to controversies between Divines of the opposite Church--but,
at last, this cunning intriguer thought it the safest plan not to go
over to Rome.[153]
[Sidenote: 1686.]
James, encouraged in his extreme folly, rushed headlong to utter
ruin. It was not because he had become a Roman Catholic, it was not
simply because he sought to promote the interests of the Church which
he had espoused; it was because, in seeking to accomplish that end,
he violated the Constitution of his country. His despotism, not his
religion, was the immediate cause of his losing a throne. He violated
the law--that most sacred palladium in the eyes of an Englishman.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account