Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
The proceedings at Oxford are still more remarkable. A vacancy occurred
in the highest office in Magdalen College. Notwithstanding the
vested power of the Fellows to choose a President, Royal letters of
nomination had been sometimes sent; and, as in deference to Royalty,
such letters of nomination had been accepted and obeyed, precedents
could be pleaded in this instance for the interference of the King.
He recommended Anthony Farmer, a man who laboured under the threefold
disqualification, of not being a moral character, of not being a
Protestant Churchman, and of neither being, nor ever having been, a
Fellow either of Magdalen or New College. The last circumstance, on
statutory grounds alone, sufficed to exclude this nominee. The Fellows,
of course, objected to him, and requested His Majesty to recommend
another person. The election had been fixed for the 13th of April.
The day arrived, without a further nomination from the Crown. At an
adjourned meeting on the 15th, no notice having been taken of their
request, the Fellows proceeded to make their election, and their choice
fell on Dr. John Hough, a person of high reputation, whose firmness
throughout the following troubles, have won for him a lasting renown.
In June the Fellows were summoned to appear before the Commission, at
Whitehall, to answer for what they had done. Jeffreys, the King’s evil
star--whose conduct, both on the Bench and at the Council Board, must
be pronounced one of the greatest curses, and whose appointment to the
custody of the Great Seal must be held as one of the greatest crimes
of this inglorious reign--badgered the deputation sent from Oxford
to represent the College, as he had before badgered the deputation
sent from Cambridge. “Who is this man?” he asked, as Dr. Fairfax
raised a question touching the validity of the Commission. “Pray, what
commission have you to be so impudent in Court? This man ought to be
kept in a dark room. Why do you suffer him without a guardian? Why did
not you bring him to me to beg him? Pray, let the officers seize him.”
Hough’s election was declared void, and Fairfax was suspended from his
Fellowship;[194] but the nomination of such a man as Farmer was too
outrageous to be pursued any further, even by the impudent despotism
which had already defied law and order to an intolerable extent.
[Sidenote: PROMOTION OF ROMANISTS.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account