Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 5—The Church of the RevolutionStoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 5—The Church of the Revolution
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
“We who waited on your Grace on Sunday last, in the evening,
being sensible that we were defective in the delivery of
our message, occasioned, in great measure, out of profound
respect to your Grace, have, upon a fuller recollection of
the importance of that affair, presumed to lay our thoughts
more plainly before your Grace, humbly conceiving, with all
due submission to your Grace’s judgment, that if your Grace
shall think it proper to give your personal assistance to the
gentlemen under sentence of death, it would not only be a
very great comfort and satisfaction to the dying gentlemen,
but likewise a considerable support and encouragement to all
surviving honest men.
“My Lord, the concern is very extraordinary, otherwise we had
not presumed to give your Grace this trouble, and therefore, we
humbly beg your Grace would please to excuse this freedom.[202]
“JEREMY COLLIER,
“SHADRACH COOKE.”
Turner, Bishop of Ely, was charged with complicity in Preston’s
treasonable business, and two suspicious letters were produced, said
to be in the Prelate’s handwriting; but I cannot find evidence of
their authorship, or any proof in their contents justifying a charge
of treason. As Turner immediately hid himself, and then absconded,
it looks, notwithstanding, as if he felt a pang of conscious guilt;
but concealment in his case seems to have been a difficult matter,
for he had such a remarkable nose, that Sancroft, with a play of
humour,--which occasionally illumined his misfortunes,--spoke of
his friend as resembling Paul’s ship of Alexandria, which carried
a well-known sign upon its prow, or beak. Hence, though London was
a great wood, it would be hard for one with such a face, however
disguised by a patriarchal beard, or by a huge peruke, to escape
detection.[203] It is not a little remarkable that, though the deposed
Primate prayed for his friend’s safety, he expressed no conviction
of his friend’s innocence. The Nonjurors, as we have seen, had been
treated with consideration and kindness. Though forfeiting their Sees
in February, 1690, after which successors were nominated, the Prelates
of the party were allowed to retain their palaces; and even as late
as April, 1691, attempts were made by friends of the Government to
compromise matters with them, in spite of the increased odium cast on
their order by Turner’s conduct: it was proposed that, at least, they
should disavow all share in the alleged conspiracy, but Sancroft would
do nothing of the kind, easy and reasonable as such a concession seemed.
[Sidenote: NONJURORS EJECTED.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account